Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 3, 2023

Manus v. Pincione

Judge
Clarke
Docket
1:23-cv-06149
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Manus v. Pincione, Judge Clarke ordered a briefing schedule in case Plaintiff invokes the forum-defendant rule against removal.

Who this affects

The order affects Plaintiff Ninotchka Manus’s ability to challenge the removal under the forum-defendant rule and sets deadlines for Defendant Max Pincione to oppose that challenge.

What happened

Manus v. Pincione began in New York state court and was removed to federal court by Defendant Max Pincione. The opinion states that Plaintiff Ninotchka Manus is a Florida citizen and Defendant is a New York citizen. Defendant claimed federal jurisdiction based on the parties’ different citizenship.

Federal law generally prevents removal based on diversity of citizenship when a properly joined and served defendant is a citizen of the state where the lawsuit was filed. The court noted that Pincione is a New York citizen and appears to have been served before removal. The court also noted that, under Second Circuit law, this rule appears procedural and may be waived.

Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke did not decide whether the case should remain in federal court or return to state court. Instead, she ordered that Manus must file a motion by August 16, 2023, if she wished to invoke the rule; Pincione’s opposition was due August 30, and Manus’s reply was due September 6.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Manus v. Pincione · No. 1:23-cv-06149
Judge
Clarke
Date
Aug. 3, 2023

Background

This action was removed from the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, on July 17, 2023. Defendant Max Pincione asserted that federal jurisdiction existed based on diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). The opinion states that Plaintiff Ninotchka Manus is a citizen of Florida and that Pincione is a citizen and resident of New York State.

Removal issue

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), a defendant may remove a state-court action when the federal district court has original jurisdiction. But the diversity-removal statute contains a forum-defendant rule: a case generally may not be removed when a properly joined and served defendant is a citizen of the state where the action was filed. The court stated that the rule applied here because Pincione is a New York citizen and appears to have been served in June 2023, before removal.

The court also explained that Second Circuit precedent treats the forum-defendant rule as procedural, meaning a party may waive it. The opinion noted contrary authority from the Eighth Circuit, which treats the rule as jurisdictional and not waivable.

Order

Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke ordered that, if Manus wished to invoke § 1441(b)(2), she must file a motion by August 16, 2023. Pincione’s opposition was due August 30, 2023, and Manus’s reply was due September 6, 2023. The court further ordered Pincione’s counsel to promptly provide Plaintiff’s counsel with a copy of the order by email, fax, or hand delivery.

The opinion did not itself grant or deny a motion, decide whether the forum-defendant rule was waived, or determine whether the case would remain in federal court.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.