The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Selective Fire and Casualty…
The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Selective Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
- Vyskocil
- 1:21-cv-02625
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Travelers v. Selective, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the settled action, denied reconsideration as moot, and set September 9, 2023 as the restoration deadline.
The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut and Selective Fire and Casualty Insurance Company.
What happened
The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Selective Fire and Casualty Insurance Company ended after the parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if an application was made by September 9, 2023. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The court also said that all other dates and deadlines were postponed indefinitely.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil denied the pending motion for reconsideration as moot, meaning the settlement and dismissal made that motion unnecessary.
The detailed version
- The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Selective Fire and Casualty… · No. 1:21-cv-02625
- Vyskocil
- Aug. 9, 2023
Background The parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
Court’s action The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if an application to restore it was made by September 9, 2023. The order further states that, if no application was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice.
The court denied the pending motion for reconsideration as moot, meaning that the settlement and discontinuance made the motion unnecessary. It also adjourned, or postponed, all other dates and deadlines indefinitely.
Disposition Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order of dismissal on August 9, 2023. The order did not decide the underlying merits of the parties’ dispute.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.