Andes Petroleum Ecuador Ltd. v. Occidental Exploration and Production Company
- Alvin Hellerstein
- 1:21-cv-03930
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Andes Petroleum v. Occidental Exploration, Judge Hellerstein granted Andes’s motion to seal materials supporting a turnover request.
Andes Petroleum Ecuador Ltd. was permitted to file specified materials under seal, affecting public access to documents supporting its turnover motion against Occidental Petroleum Corporation. Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company were the entities involved in the underlying judgment-enforcement proceedings.
What happened
In Andes Petroleum Ecuador Limited v. Occidental Exploration and Production Company, Andes sought permission to file a redacted memorandum and seven exhibits under seal while pursuing a turnover order against Occidental Petroleum Corporation. Andes said the materials had been designated confidential under a protective order entered in related litigation.
The materials concerned a judgment against Occidental Exploration and Production Company. Andes said that only three percent of the judgment had been paid and that the company claimed not to have additional assets. Andes also argued that the documents did not contain legitimate confidential business information, but said it needed to comply with the protective order.
Judge Hellerstein granted the motion to seal. The opinion did not decide whether Andes was entitled to the requested turnover order or whether the materials should ultimately remain sealed.
The detailed version
- Andes Petroleum Ecuador Ltd. v. Occidental Exploration and Production Company · No. 1:21-cv-03930
- Alvin Hellerstein
- Aug. 9, 2023
Background
Andes Petroleum Ecuador Ltd. was the judgment creditor in the case. The court had entered a December 2, 2021 judgment against Occidental Exploration and Production Company, a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum Corporation, for $558,577,380.56 plus costs. Andes stated that only three percent of the judgment debt had been paid and that Occidental Exploration and Production Company had represented that it had no additional assets.
Andes was pursuing a motion for a turnover order against Occidental Petroleum Corporation under Rule 69 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Section 5225(b) of New York’s Civil Practice Laws and Rules. A turnover order is a court order requiring property or assets to be turned over to satisfy a judgment. Andes’s motion argued that Occidental Petroleum Corporation should be treated as the alter ego of Occidental Exploration and Production Company, according to the letter.
Request to Seal
Andes asked to file a redacted version of its memorandum and seven exhibits under seal. The exhibits included transcripts from depositions of six Occidental Petroleum Corporation officers, directors, and employees. The depositions had been taken for use in both this case and a separate related state-court action. A protective order in that related action designated the entirety of the deposition transcripts as confidential.
Andes stated that it did not believe the transcripts or exhibits contained proprietary business information and noted the general presumption that court records should be open to public inspection. But Andes said it had to file the documents under seal to comply with the protective order. The letter also gave Occidental Petroleum Corporation notice that, under Judge Hellerstein’s individual practices, it had to explain promptly why sealing was necessary.
Ruling
Judge Hellerstein granted the motion to seal. The opinion did not resolve the merits of Andes’s turnover motion, determine whether Occidental Petroleum Corporation was the alter ego of Occidental Exploration and Production Company, or decide the ultimate confidentiality of the documents. This was a ruling on the filing of materials under seal, not on the underlying judgment-enforcement dispute.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.