Bassaw v. Eileen Grays LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:23-cv-06069
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Bassaw v. Eileen Grays LLC, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, subject to restoration by September 11.
Shivan Bassaw and Eileen Grays LLC; the action was discontinued, with possible restoration by September 11, 2023, and with prejudice if no restoration application was made by then.
What happened
Bassaw v. Eileen Grays LLC involved a letter from Plaintiff Shivan Bassaw telling the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court did not decide the underlying claims. It discontinued the action without costs to either party and allowed the case to be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and an application was made by September 11, 2023.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no application to restore the case was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Bassaw v. Eileen Grays LLC · No. 1:23-cv-06069
- Vyskocil
- Aug. 11, 2023
Background The court received a letter from Plaintiff Shivan Bassaw stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the claims, the settlement terms, or whether the settlement was later finalized.
Ruling The court ordered that the action was discontinued without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar. Restoration was permitted if the parties could not memorialize their settlement in writing, provided that an application to restore the action was made by September 11, 2023.
The court further ordered that if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The court did not reach the merits of Bassaw’s claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.