Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 11, 2023

Keawsri v. Ramen-ya Inc.

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:17-cv-02406
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureEvidence
In one sentence

In Keawsri v. Ramen-ya Inc., Judge Liman ordered plaintiffs to brief Miho Maki’s Fifth Amendment invocation by August 14, without deciding the issue.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and Miho Maki, whose Fifth Amendment invocation was the subject of the briefing.

What happened

In Keawsri v. Ramen-ya Inc., the court addressed briefing about Miho Maki’s invocation of her Fifth Amendment rights before a hearing on the plaintiffs’ motion to enforce.

The court ordered the plaintiffs to file an opposition brief by August 14, 2023. The brief must discuss whether these proceedings qualify as the “same proceeding” for purposes of waiving the Fifth Amendment.

Judge Lewis J. Liman issued the order on August 11, 2023. The order set a briefing requirement and did not resolve Maki’s Fifth Amendment issue or the motion to enforce.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Keawsri v. Ramen-ya Inc. · No. 1:17-cv-02406
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Aug. 11, 2023

Background

At a July 20, 2023 conference, criminal counsel for Miho Maki stated that counsel would submit a brief concerning Maki’s invocation of her Fifth Amendment rights before the hearing on the plaintiffs’ motion to enforce. The plaintiffs’ counsel agreed to submit an opposition brief one week after Maki’s brief.

Maki’s counsel filed a motion concerning the invocation on August 7, 2023.

Order

The court ordered the plaintiffs to submit their opposition brief by August 14, 2023. The brief must include a discussion of whether the current proceedings qualify as the “same proceeding” for purposes of determining whether Maki waived her Fifth Amendment rights. The court cited Klein v. Harris and United States v. Miranti in connection with that issue.

Effect of the Order

This order sets a briefing deadline. It does not state a ruling on whether Maki invoked or waived her Fifth Amendment rights, and it does not decide the plaintiffs’ motion to enforce.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.