Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 11, 2023

Aobad v. Building Service 32 BJ Pension Fund

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:23-cv-01730
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Aobad v. Building Service 32 BJ Pension Fund, Judge Gorenstein denied Aobad’s request for appointed counsel.

Who this affects

Saeed S. Aobad, the pro se plaintiff, whose request for court-requested volunteer counsel was denied for now.

What happened

In Aobad v. Building Service 32 BJ Pension Fund, Saeed S. Aobad, who was representing himself, asked the court to seek counsel for him.

The court said the papers filed so far did not show that his claim was likely strong enough to justify seeking volunteer counsel. It also said the case was not so difficult that Aobad could not address the relevant facts or expected issues.

Judge Gorenstein denied the request. The court said it could seek counsel without another request if later review showed that appointment was warranted.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Aobad v. Building Service 32 BJ Pension Fund · No. 1:23-cv-01730
Judge
James Oetken
Date
Aug. 11, 2023

Background

Saeed S. Aobad, who was proceeding without a lawyer, asked the court to request counsel on his behalf. The request was filed as Docket No. 40.

Court’s analysis

The court applied the factors described in Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co. The court concluded that Aobad’s application and the other papers in the case did not, at that time, show that his claim was likely to be sufficiently substantial to justify seeking volunteer counsel. The court also concluded that the case was not of a character that would prevent Aobad from addressing relevant facts or dealing with issues likely to arise. It noted that attorney’s fees are available for claims such as Aobad’s, which the court said provides readily available counsel in meritorious cases.

Ruling

Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein denied Aobad’s request for the court to seek counsel. The court stated that it would seek appointment of counsel without another request from Aobad if later review showed that appointment was warranted.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.