Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 14, 2023

Orr v. Tristate Note Repurchase Group LLC

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:22-cv-10070
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaFee Petition
In one sentence

In Orr v. Tristate Note Repurchase Group LLC, Judge Briccetti approved the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and closed the case.

Who this affects

The settlement affected Jeffrey Orr, his bankruptcy estate, the defendant Tristate Note Repurchase Group LLC, and the represented parties covered by the agreement.

What happened

Orr v. Tristate Note Repurchase Group LLC was a Fair Labor Standards Act case in which Jeffrey Orr filed a proposed settlement with the defendant.

The $55,000 settlement allocated $35,581.22 to Orr and his bankruptcy estate, exceeding his estimated unpaid wages. The parties were represented by lawyers, used a neutral mediator, and agreed to a limited employment-related release without confidentiality or non-disparagement provisions. The proposed attorney’s fees—one-third of the gross settlement, plus costs—were also submitted for approval.

The court found the settlement fair, reasonable, and reached through an arm’s-length negotiation rather than fraud or collusion. Judge Briccetti approved the settlement agreement and directed the Clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Orr v. Tristate Note Repurchase Group LLC · No. 7:22-cv-10070
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Aug. 14, 2023

Background

Jeffrey Orr brought this Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) case individually and on behalf of others similarly situated against Tristate Note Repurchase Group LLC, doing business as Wingate by Wyndham Fishkill. On August 10, 2023, Orr filed a settlement agreement and a statement explaining its basis, as required for court review under the Second Circuit’s decision in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.

Settlement Review

The court considered several factors in reviewing the proposed settlement:

- The total settlement was $55,000. Of that amount, $35,581.22 was attributed to Orr and his bankruptcy estate, exceeding Orr’s calculation of approximately $23,143 in actual unpaid wages. - The parties had a genuine dispute about whether Orr was properly paid. The court noted that differences between pay and time records could be explained by supplemental cash payments that did not appear on the pay records. - All parties were represented by counsel. - Orr’s Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee approved the settlement. - A neutral mediator assisted with reaching the agreement. - The parties wanted to resolve the case early and avoid the costs and uncertainty of extended litigation. - The release was limited to employment-related claims that accrued before Orr signed the settlement agreement. - The agreement contained no confidentiality or non-disparagement clause.

The court found that the agreement was fair and reasonable and resulted from arm’s-length negotiations, rather than fraud or collusion.

Attorney’s Fees

The court also found reasonable the requested attorney’s fees, which totaled one-third of the gross settlement amount, together with reimbursement of costs.

Disposition

The court approved the parties’ settlement agreement. It directed the Clerk to close the case. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti signed the order on August 14, 2023.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.