Hyper Bicycles, Inc. v. Acctel, Ltd.
- Denise Cote
- 1:22-cv-01601
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Hyper Bicycles v. Acctel, Acctel asked Judge Cote to hear argument and seal materials; the provided text contains no ruling.
Acctel, Hyper Bicycles, Inc., and public access to the specified Acctel financial and settlement materials; the provided text does not show any court action.
What happened
In Hyper Bicycles, Inc. v. Acctel, Ltd., Acctel’s counsel asked the court to hear oral argument about duress in the parties’ summary-judgment motions.
Acctel also asked the court to keep certain translated bank statements and information about a confidential settlement sealed, arguing that disclosure could harm its business.
The provided text does not show a court ruling; it is a letter to Judge Denise L. Cote requesting relief.
The detailed version
- Hyper Bicycles, Inc. v. Acctel, Ltd. · No. 1:22-cv-01601
- Denise Cote
- Aug. 15, 2023
Nature of the Document
The provided text is an August 11, 2023 letter from counsel for Acctel, Ltd. to Judge Denise L. Cote. It is not a judicial opinion or order, and it does not state that the court granted or denied any request.
Requests by Acctel
Acctel asked for oral argument on its cross-motion for summary judgment and Hyper Bicycles, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. The letter states that both motions concern the issue of duress.
Acctel also asked the court to keep under seal two translated exhibits containing detailed bank statements from September and October 2021. It further requested continued sealing of limited portions of a declaration concerning a confidential settlement with TPT and certain previously authorized redactions.
Arguments About Sealing
Acctel argued that the materials were filed in connection with summary-judgment motions and therefore were judicial documents. It acknowledged a presumption of public access but argued that the public interest was limited and that the materials contained commercially sensitive financial and settlement information. Acctel asserted that disclosure could give competitors an advantage and stated that it had taken steps to preserve the information’s confidentiality.
Disposition
The provided text contains no ruling by Judge Cote on oral argument, sealing, the summary-judgment motions, or the issue of duress. The court’s action, if any, is not shown in the supplied text.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.