Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 15, 2023

Brown v. CE Solutions Group, LLC

Judge
Clarke
Docket
1:23-cv-03029
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Brown v. CE Solutions Group, LLC, Judge Clarke reassigned the case and ordered a joint status letter by September 8, 2023.

Who this affects

The parties and their counsel in Brown v. CE Solutions Group, LLC, including anyone responsible for filing the required joint status letter or requesting a deadline extension or postponement.

What happened

Brown v. CE Solutions Group, LLC was reassigned to Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke. The notice does not describe or decide the parties’ underlying claims.

The court kept all prior orders, dates, and deadlines in place unless changed later, but postponed any currently scheduled conference or oral argument. It ordered the parties to file a joint letter by September 8, 2023, addressing the case’s status, jurisdiction and venue, deadlines, motions, discovery, settlement discussions, possible alternative dispute resolution, and estimated trial length.

Judge Clarke also explained the procedures for requesting extensions or postponements. If the case had already ended, the parties did not need to file the joint letter if proof of termination was filed before the deadline.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Brown v. CE Solutions Group, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-03029
Judge
Clarke
Date
Aug. 15, 2023

Background

This notice states that the case was reassigned to United States District Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke. The opinion does not identify the nature of the plaintiffs’ claims or the defendants’ defenses.

Court’s directives

Unless the court orders otherwise, all prior orders, dates, and deadlines remain effective after reassignment. Any currently scheduled conference or oral argument before the court is postponed pending further order.

The court ordered the parties to file a joint letter on the electronic docket by September 8, 2023. The letter may not exceed five pages, although an appendix containing lengthy jurisdictional information is excluded from that limit. The letter must address counsel’s current contact information; the nature of the case, principal defenses, and major legal and factual issues; the basis for jurisdiction and venue; existing deadlines; previously scheduled conferences; outstanding motions; pending appeals; completed and remaining discovery; prior settlement discussions without exact offers or demands; possible alternative dispute resolution; estimated trial length; and other information that might help move the case toward settlement or trial.

The order further states that no joint letter or appearance is required if the case has been settled or otherwise terminated and the appropriate proof of termination is filed before the deadline. Requests for extensions or postponements must be made by an electronic letter-motion received at least 48 hours before the relevant deadline or conference and must provide the information listed in the order, including the requested dates, prior requests, reasons, the opposing party’s position, and any next scheduled court appearance.

Disposition

Judge Clarke issued a case-management and reassignment order requiring the joint status letter and setting procedures for any extension or postponement request. The notice does not rule on the underlying claims, defenses, or any dispositive motion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.