Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 16, 2023

Specialty Granules LLC v. V6 Agronomy, Inc.

Judge
Subramanian
Docket
1:23-cv-05334
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Specialty Granules v. V6 Agronomy, Judge Subramanian ordered the plaintiff to amend its complaint to properly allege citizenship for diversity jurisdiction.

Who this affects

Specialty Granules LLC, which must provide additional ownership-citizenship information, and V6 Agronomy, Inc., because the court’s jurisdiction over the case depends on complete diversity of citizenship.

What happened

Specialty Granules LLC sued V6 Agronomy, Inc., claiming that the federal court could hear the case because the parties are citizens of different states.

The complaint said Specialty Granules was a citizen of Delaware. The court explained that an LLC’s citizenship depends on the citizenship of each of its members, including the citizenship of entities in its ownership chain. The complaint did not provide that information.

Judge Subramanian ordered Specialty Granules to amend its complaint by August 21, 2023, at 5:00 p.m., to identify the citizenship of each person or entity comprising the LLC. He warned that if the plaintiff could not truthfully allege complete diversity, the complaint would be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction without further notice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Specialty Granules LLC v. V6 Agronomy, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-05334
Judge
Subramanian
Date
Aug. 16, 2023

Background

Specialty Granules LLC brought the action against V6 Agronomy, Inc. The complaint invoked diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, which allows a federal court to hear certain disputes between citizens of different states. The complaint alleged that Specialty Granules was a citizen of Delaware.

Citizenship of an LLC

The court explained that an LLC is a citizen of every state where its members are citizens. Therefore, a complaint relying on diversity jurisdiction must identify the citizenship of each natural-person member and the incorporation state and principal place of business of each corporate member. It must also identify the citizenship of members that are themselves LLCs. The opinion does not provide the citizenship information for Specialty Granules’ members or state V6 Agronomy’s citizenship.

Order

The court ordered Specialty Granules to amend its complaint by August 21, 2023, at 5:00 p.m., to allege the citizenship of each person or entity comprising the plaintiff LLC. The court further ordered that, if Specialty Granules could not truthfully allege complete diversity, the complaint would be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction without further notice to either party.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.