Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 16, 2023

MWW Group, LLC v. PraSaga LLC

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:23-cv-06743
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In MWW Group v. PraSaga, Judge Rochon ordered more information to determine whether federal diversity jurisdiction exists.

Who this affects

MWW Group, LLC must provide ownership and citizenship information about PraSaga LLC so the court can determine whether diversity jurisdiction exists.

What happened

MWW Group, LLC sued PraSaga LLC, alleging that the court had jurisdiction because the parties were citizens of different states. The complaint identified citizenship information for MWW Group’s members but did not identify the members or citizenship of PraSaga’s LLC members.

Because an LLC’s citizenship depends on the citizenship of all its members, the court could not determine whether it had jurisdiction over the dispute. The court therefore ordered MWW Group to provide additional information supported by sworn affidavits.

Judge Rochon ordered MWW Group to file that information by August 23, 2023, including the identity and citizenship of PraSaga’s members and, if needed, the members of any LLC in PraSaga’s ownership chain. The opinion does not decide the underlying dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
MWW Group, LLC v. PraSaga LLC · No. 1:23-cv-06743
Judge
Rochon
Date
Aug. 16, 2023

Background

MWW Group, LLC filed its complaint on August 1, 2023. The complaint asserted federal subject-matter jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. It alleged that MWW Group is a limited liability company formed under Delaware law with its principal place of business in New York, and that PraSaga LLC is a Nevada limited liability company with its principal place of business in Nevada.

The court had previously ordered MWW Group to file a statement identifying its ownership. That statement said MWW Group’s members were citizens of New York, Washington, D.C., New Jersey, Florida, Illinois, and Maryland.

Jurisdictional Issue

For diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company is treated as a citizen of every state where its members are citizens. If an LLC’s members include other non-corporate entities, the party invoking federal jurisdiction must identify and allege the citizenship of the ownership chain until the citizenship of every relevant individual and corporation is established.

MWW Group’s complaint did not allege the citizenship of PraSaga’s LLC members. As a result, the court could not determine whether it had subject-matter jurisdiction over the dispute.

Order

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon ordered MWW Group to file, no later than August 23, 2023, a letter supported by one or more sworn affidavits. The filing must provide the information needed for the court to exercise subject-matter jurisdiction, including the identity and citizenship of PraSaga’s members and, if necessary, the identity and citizenship of any members of PraSaga’s members that are themselves limited liability companies.

The order addresses only whether the court can establish federal jurisdiction. It does not decide the parties’ underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.