Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 15, 2023

Chamberlain v. Splashlight, LLC

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:23-cv-06318
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Chamberlain v. Splashlight, Judge Valerie Caproni ordered the United States Marshals Service to serve defendants after granting Chamberlain permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

Lucas Cone Chamberlain and the defendants Splashlight, LLC, Michaela Krebs, and Bijou Summers; the Clerk of Court and the United States Marshals Service were directed to take steps to complete service.

What happened

In Chamberlain v. Splashlight, Lucas Cone Chamberlain, representing himself, sued his former employer, Splashlight, LLC, and Michaela Krebs and Bijou Summers. He alleged sex discrimination under federal, New York State, and New York City laws.

Because Chamberlain had permission to proceed without prepaying court fees, the court directed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses and provide the necessary paperwork to the United States Marshals Service. The Marshals Service is to serve Splashlight, Krebs, and Summers. The service period was extended to 90 days after the summonses are issued.

Judge Valerie Caproni also directed Chamberlain to notify the court if his address changes and stated that the case could be dismissed if he fails to do so. This order addressed service of the lawsuit, not whether the discrimination allegations are valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Chamberlain v. Splashlight, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-06318
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Aug. 15, 2023

Background

Lucas Cone Chamberlain brings this action without a lawyer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New York State and New York City Human Rights Laws. He alleges that his former employer discriminated against him because of his sex. The defendants are Splashlight, LLC, Michaela Krebs, and Bijou Summers.

The court had previously granted Chamberlain permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees, a status commonly called proceeding in forma pauperis. The opinion states that a plaintiff with that status may rely on the court and the United States Marshals Service to complete service of the summons and complaint.

Court’s Action

The court directed the Clerk of Court to complete a United States Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, issue the summonses, and deliver the required documents to the Marshals Service for service. The listed service address for each defendant was 75 Varick Street, 3rd Floor, New York, New York 10013.

The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses are issued because Chamberlain could not serve the summonses and complaint before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered the summonses issued. The court stated that Chamberlain should request an extension if service is not completed within that period. It also required him to notify the court in writing of any address change and stated that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.

Disposition and Scope

The order directs the Clerk of Court to issue the summonses and arrange service through the United States Marshals Service. It does not decide the merits of Chamberlain’s sex-discrimination allegations or state whether any defendant violated the cited laws. The court also directed the Clerk to mail Chamberlain an information package.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.