Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Hajjar
- Rochon
- 1:22-cv-08269
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Shanghai Fosun v. Hajjar, Judge Rochon stayed the case and ordered corporate respondents to obtain counsel after their lawyer withdrew.
The proceeding is stayed. Dr. John Hajjar is already subject to an automatic stay because of his bankruptcy, and Sovereign Medical Services, Inc. and Sovereign Capital Holdings, LLC must obtain counsel and file a notice of appearance within 45 days.
What happened
In Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical (Group) Co., Ltd. v. Hajjar, Dr. John Hajjar filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, automatically staying the case as to him. The respondents’ law firm later withdrew, and no replacement lawyer appeared for Sovereign Medical Services, Inc. or Sovereign Capital Holdings, LLC.
The court said the two corporate respondents could not participate without lawyers. It stayed the entire proceeding to give them time to obtain replacement counsel.
Judge Rochon directed the Clerk of Court to mark the docket as stayed and ordered Sovereign Medical Services and Sovereign Capital Holdings to obtain counsel and file a notice of appearance within 45 days.
The detailed version
- Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Hajjar · No. 1:22-cv-08269
- Rochon
- Aug. 15, 2023
Background
Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical (Group) Co., Ltd. told the court that Respondent Dr. John Hajjar had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on June 9, 2023. That bankruptcy filing automatically stayed this action as to Hajjar, but not as to the other respondents: Sovereign Medical Services, Inc. (SMS) and Sovereign Capital Holdings, LLC (SCH).
Frier & Levitt, LLC, which had represented the respondents, moved to withdraw as counsel of record for all three respondents. On July 17, 2023, the court granted that motion, subject to service and contact-information requirements. The court also ruled that SMS and SCH, as corporations, could not proceed without lawyers and ordered them to retain replacement counsel and file a notice of appearance by August 14, 2023. No notice of appearance was filed.
Court’s Reasoning
The court explained that it has authority to stay proceedings to manage its docket and may stay a civil case when the interests of justice require it. Because the action was already stayed as to Hajjar and SMS and SCH could not participate without counsel, the court found that staying the entire proceeding would allow the corporate respondents time to obtain replacement counsel.
Order
Judge Jennifer L. Rochon directed the Clerk of Court to mark the docket as stayed. The court further ordered SMS and SCH to obtain counsel and have counsel file a notice of appearance within the next 45 days. The order did not decide the underlying claims.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.