Barrios-Contreras v. Big Fish Entertainment, LLC
- Clarke
- 1:23-cv-05821
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Barrios-Contreras v. Big Fish Entertainment, Judge Clarke ordered Marshals to serve five defendants in plaintiff’s fee-free discrimination case.
The order affects Liliana Barrios-Contreras and the five defendants to be served through the U.S. Marshals Service: Rasheed Daniels, Max Miller, Charmaine Walker, Van Johnson, and Corey Robinson.
What happened
Barrios-Contreras v. Big Fish Entertainment, LLC is a pro se lawsuit in which Liliana Barrios-Contreras alleges that her employer discriminated against her because of her sex and race. She also brings state-law claims for defamation, slander, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Because the court allowed Barrios-Contreras to proceed without paying fees in advance, she could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. She provided service addresses for Rasheed Daniels, Max Miller, Charmaine Walker, Van Johnson, and Corey Robinson.
Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke ordered the Clerk of Court to issue summonses, complete the required service forms, and send the necessary documents to the Marshals Service for those five defendants. The order addressed service only and did not decide whether Barrios-Contreras’s claims were valid.
The detailed version
- Barrios-Contreras v. Big Fish Entertainment, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-05821
- Clarke
- Aug. 16, 2023
Background
Liliana Barrios-Contreras brought this action without a lawyer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. She alleges that her employer discriminated against her based on sex and race. She also asserts state-law claims for defamation, slander, and intentional infliction of emotional distress against Big Fish Entertainment, LLC, Dan Cesareo, Rasheed Daniels, Max Miller, Charmaine Walker, Van Johnson, Corey Robinson, and unidentified defendants.
The court had previously allowed Barrios-Contreras to proceed without prepaying filing fees. It had ordered summonses for Big Fish Entertainment, LLC and Dan Cesareo and directed Barrios-Contreras to provide service addresses for Daniels, Miller, Walker, Johnson, and Robinson. She filed those addresses on August 11, 2023.
Service Ruling
The court explained that a person allowed to proceed without prepaying fees may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to complete service. The Clerk of Court was therefore instructed to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for Daniels, Miller, Walker, Johnson, and Robinson, issue summonses, and send the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service.
The court stated that service should occur within 90 days after the summonses are issued. If the complaint is not served within that period, Barrios-Contreras should request an extension of time. She was also required to notify the court in writing of any address change, and the court stated that it may dismiss the action if she fails to do so.
Disposition and Effect
The order granted the requested assistance with serving the five remaining defendants. It did not rule on the merits of the discrimination, defamation, slander, or emotional-distress claims. Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke also directed the Clerk of Court to mail an information package to Barrios-Contreras.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.