Brown v. Annucci
- Cathy Seibel
- 7:23-cv-06056
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 9
In Brown v. Annucci, Judge Seibel added a defendant, ordered service steps, and directed identification of unnamed officers in Brown’s civil-rights case.
Byron K. Brown, the added defendant Captain N, Anthony Annucci, Sergeant Joseph, the two unnamed officers, the New York State Attorney General, the court clerk, the U.S. Marshals Service, and the New York Legal Assistance Group clinic.
What happened
Byron K. Brown sued Anthony Annucci, Joseph Sergeant, and two unnamed officers, alleging that they prevented him from attending a Jumah prayer service. He brought claims under the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act while representing himself and proceeding without paying filing fees up front.
The court directed the clerk to add “Captain N” as a defendant because Brown’s complaint appeared intended to bring claims against that person. It also ordered the clerk to issue summonses and paperwork for service on Annucci and Sergeant Joseph through the U.S. Marshals Service. The New York State Attorney General was ordered to identify the two unnamed officers and provide their badge numbers and service addresses so Brown could file an amended complaint naming them.
Judge Seibel did not decide whether Brown’s religious-liberty claims were legally valid. The order addressed adding a defendant, identifying unnamed defendants, serving the complaint, and referring Brown to a legal clinic for people representing themselves.
The detailed version
- Brown v. Annucci · No. 7:23-cv-06056
- Cathy Seibel
- Aug. 16, 2023
Background
Byron K. Brown, who the opinion says is incarcerated at Sing Sing Correctional Facility, filed this self-represented action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that the defendants denied him the ability to attend a Jumah prayer service, violating the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. The court had previously granted Brown permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees, although the opinion notes that prisoners remain responsible for paying the full filing fee over time.
The defendants named in the caption were Anthony Annucci, identified as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision; Joseph Sergeant; and two unnamed officers identified as John Doe, Officer in Charge, and John Doe, Escorting Officer. Brown also alleged that “Captain N” issued an email and falsified reports contributing to the alleged denial of his religious rights, but he had not named Captain N as a defendant.
Court’s Actions
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, the court directed the clerk to add “Captain N” as a defendant. The court stated that this amendment did not affect any defenses Captain N might assert.
Because Brown was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court directed the clerk to prepare the required U.S. Marshals Service forms, issue summonses, and provide the necessary papers so the Marshals Service could serve Annucci and Sergeant Joseph. The court stated that if service was not completed within 90 days after the summonses were issued, Brown should request more time. It also required Brown to notify the court in writing if his address changed and warned that the case could be dismissed if he failed to do so.
The court further directed the New York State Attorney General to determine the identities, badge numbers, and service addresses of the two John Doe defendants. The Attorney General was ordered to provide that information to Brown and the court within 60 days of the order. Brown then had 30 days after receiving the information to file an amended complaint naming the John Doe defendants. The court explained that the amended complaint would replace, rather than supplement, the original complaint, and that it would screen the amended complaint before directing any additional service.
Legal Assistance and Disposition
The court referred Brown to the New York Legal Assistance Group’s clinic for self-represented civil litigants. The order explained that the clinic is a private organization, not part of the court, and that Brown would remain responsible for filing documents and meeting deadlines unless the clinic separately agreed to represent him.
This was an order concerning case administration and service, not a decision on the merits. Judge Seibel directed the clerk to add Captain N, issue service materials for Annucci and Sergeant Joseph, mail the order and complaint to the New York State Attorney General, refer Brown to the clinic, and mail Brown an information package. The opinion does not state that the court dismissed or resolved any of Brown’s claims.
Read the full 9-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.