Kennedy v. Aegis Media Americas, Inc.
- Gregory Woods
- 1:20-cv-03624
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 5
In Kennedy v. Aegis Media Americas, Inc., Judge Woods granted class certification for participants and beneficiaries of the challenged retirement plan.
The order affects the plaintiffs, Aegis Media Americas, Inc., its Board of Directors, the Plan Investment Committee, and people who participated in or benefited from the BenefitsPlus 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan between May 8, 2014, and the date of judgment, excluding the defendants and their immediate family members.
What happened
In Kennedy v. Aegis Media Americas, Inc., Stacey Parks Kennedy, Angela Bozell, and Brittney Williams claimed that Aegis Media Americas, Inc., its Board, and the Plan Investment Committee violated duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act by mishandling investment options and plan fees.
The parties agreed on a class covering people who participated in or benefited from the BenefitsPlus 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan between May 8, 2014, and the date of judgment, excluding the defendants and their immediate family members. The court found that the proposed class met the requirements for size, shared legal or factual questions, similar claims, and adequate representation; up to 11,775 people could be included.
Judge Gregory H. Woods granted the plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for class certification, appointed the three plaintiffs as class representatives, and appointed Capozzi Adler, P.C. as class counsel. The order stated that it did not abandon or limit any claim or defense.
The detailed version
- Kennedy v. Aegis Media Americas, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-03624
- Gregory Woods
- Aug. 17, 2023
Background
This putative class action arises under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, a federal law governing employee benefit plans. Stacey Parks Kennedy, Angela Bozell, and Brittney Williams alleged that Aegis Media Americas, Inc., the Board of Directors of Aegis Media Americas, Inc., and the Plan Investment Committee breached their fiduciary duty of prudence to the BenefitsPlus 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and its participants. The plaintiffs also alleged that Aegis and the Board failed to monitor the Committee’s activities.
The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in November 2020. The court later denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss. On July 6, 2023, the plaintiffs moved for class certification. The parties then agreed to certification of a class, but the court independently evaluated whether the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 were met.
Class-Certification Requirements
The court found that the plaintiffs satisfied Rule 23’s requirements. For numerosity, the court relied on the identification of up to 11,775 potential class members and found that joining all members individually would be impractical.
For commonality, the court found common questions about whether the defendants breached ERISA’s duty of prudence by selecting and monitoring the Plan’s investment options and by monitoring compensation for recordkeeping and administrative services.
For typicality, the court noted that the proposed representatives had accounts in the Plan during the proposed class period, held at least one challenged investment option, and allegedly paid excessive recordkeeping and administrative fees. The court found that the representatives and other class members allegedly suffered similar harm from the claimed fiduciary breaches.
For adequacy of representation, the court found that the named plaintiffs’ legal and financial interests aligned with those of the class. The plaintiffs submitted declarations describing their understanding of their responsibilities, and they represented that their counsel had no conflicts and would vigorously prosecute the action. The court concluded that these circumstances satisfied the adequacy requirement.
Order
Judge Gregory H. Woods granted the plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for class certification. The certified class consists of all people, except the defendants and their immediate family members, who were participants in or beneficiaries of the Plan at any time from May 8, 2014, through the date of judgment.
The court appointed Stacey Parks Kennedy, Angela Bozell, and Brittney Williams as class representatives and appointed Capozzi Adler, P.C. as class counsel. The order also stated that nothing in it should be treated as abandoning or limiting any claim or defense, and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the pending class-certification motion.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.