Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 23, 2023

Sisnero-Gil v. United States

Judge
Richard Sullivan
Docket
1:23-cv-03833
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCriminalCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Sisnero-Gil v. United States, Judge Sullivan ordered former counsel to provide sworn testimony for the pending conviction-relief petition.

Who this affects

Marlon Sisnero-Gil, his former counsel Oliver Storch, and the United States. The order requires Storch to provide sworn testimony and sets briefing deadlines for the pending petition.

What happened

In Sisnero-Gil v. United States, Marlon Sisnero-Gil asked the court for relief from his conviction under a federal law allowing such challenges. He mainly argued that his former lawyer provided ineffective assistance during his guilty plea and sentencing.

The government said it needed testimony from former counsel Oliver Storch to respond to parts of the petition. It also requested a waiver of attorney-client confidentiality, but Sisnero-Gil later filed a signed waiver.

Judge Richard J. Sullivan ordered Storch to provide sworn testimony by September 18, 2023. The court also set deadlines for the government’s response and Sisnero-Gil’s reply; it did not decide the petition’s merits in this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sisnero-Gil v. United States · No. 1:23-cv-03833
Judge
Richard Sullivan
Date
Aug. 23, 2023

Background

Marlon Sisnero-Gil, who is also identified as the defendant in the related criminal case, filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 seeking relief from his conviction. He principally alleged that his prior counsel, Oliver Storch, provided ineffective assistance in connection with his guilty plea and sentencing.

After reviewing the motion papers, the United States stated that Storch’s testimony was needed to respond to certain parts of the petition. The government asked the court to require Storch to provide sworn testimony in an affidavit or affirmation addressing Sisnero-Gil’s ineffective-assistance allegations. The government also asked Sisnero-Gil to waive attorney-client privilege because he had placed his communications with counsel at issue. Sisnero-Gil subsequently filed a signed waiver.

Order

The court found that Storch’s testimony was needed to resolve at least some portions of the petition. It ordered Storch to provide sworn testimony, in the form of an affidavit or affirmation, addressing the ineffective-assistance allegations by September 18, 2023.

The court ordered the government to file its opposition by October 2, 2023, and ordered Sisnero-Gil to file any reply by October 31, 2023. The order did not resolve whether Sisnero-Gil was entitled to relief from his conviction or otherwise decide the merits of his claims. Richard J. Sullivan, a United States Circuit Judge sitting by designation, signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.