Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 23, 2023

Abadi v. American Airlines Inc.

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:23-cv-04033
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
6
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Abadi v. American Airlines Group, Judge Liman dismissed claims against federal defendants and ordered service on the remaining defendants.

Who this affects

Aaron Abadi’s claims against President Biden, the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Anthony Steven Fauci, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Robert Ray Redfield, Jr., and the United States Department of Health and Human Services were dismissed. Claims against the remaining defendants were directed to service through the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In Abadi v. American Airlines Group, Inc., et al., Aaron Abadi, representing himself, alleged that the defendants discriminated against him and prevented him from traveling. He relied on several federal laws, including the Air Carrier Access Act and the Rehabilitation Act, and received permission to proceed without paying filing fees in advance.

The court dismissed Abadi’s claims against President Biden, federal agencies, Dr. Anthony Steven Fauci, and Dr. Robert Ray Redfield, Jr. The court ruled that those defendants were protected by legal immunity from the claims. The court ordered the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to issue summonses and serve the remaining defendants, including airlines, employees, attorneys, and medical advisory groups.

Judge Lewis J. Liman also denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The court referred Abadi to a free legal clinic for people representing themselves.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Abadi v. American Airlines Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-04033
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Aug. 23, 2023

Background

Aaron Abadi, who was representing himself, sued under the Air Carrier Access Act, sections 1985 and 1986 of Title 42, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and federal diversity jurisdiction. He alleged that the defendants discriminated against him and prohibited him from traveling. The court had previously allowed him to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Screening standard

Because Abadi was proceeding without prepaying fees, the court screened the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). That statute requires dismissal of claims that are frivolous, fail to state a legally sufficient claim, seek money from an immune defendant, or otherwise fall within the statute’s dismissal grounds. The court also noted that it must dismiss claims over which it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction. Although courts read self-represented complaints liberally, the complaint still must provide enough factual detail to make the requested relief plausible.

Claims against federal defendants

The court treated Abadi’s allegations that his constitutional rights were violated by President Biden, the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Anthony Steven Fauci, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Robert Ray Redfield, Jr., and the United States Department of Health and Human Services as claims against federal officials and federal agencies under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics.

The court dismissed all claims against those defendants. It held that sovereign immunity barred suits against the federal government and federal agencies unless immunity had been waived. The court also stated that Abadi did not allege that he had completed the administrative process required for a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act. In addition, the court stated that the President was absolutely immune from damages claims based on official acts. The court characterized the claims against these defendants as barred by sovereign immunity, absolute immunity, and frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii).

Service on remaining defendants

The court did not dismiss the claims against the remaining defendants at this stage. Because Abadi had permission to proceed without prepaying fees, the court ordered the Clerk of Court to prepare the required service forms, issue summonses, and deliver the necessary papers to the U.S. Marshals Service. The remaining defendants included 46 airlines, several employees, two attorneys, and two medical advisory groups, although the opinion does not list all of them by name.

The court stated that service must be completed within 90 days after the summonses are issued. If service is not completed within that period, Abadi should request an extension. The court also required him to notify the court in writing if his address changes and referred him to the New York Legal Assistance Group’s clinic for people representing themselves in civil cases.

Disposition

The court dismissed Abadi’s claims against President Biden, the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Fauci, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Redfield, and the Department of Health and Human Services. It ordered service on the remaining defendants. The court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Abadi permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The order does not state that the dismissed claims were dismissed with or without prejudice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.