Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 25, 2023

Federal Trade Commission v. IQVIA Holdings Inc.

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:23-cv-06188
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

Federal Trade Commission v. IQVIA Holdings Inc.: Judge Ramos granted the FTC’s request to redact confidential information and seal the unredacted letter.

Who this affects

The Federal Trade Commission, IQVIA, Propel, and members of the public seeking access to the letter and its contents.

What happened

In Federal Trade Commission v. IQVIA Holdings Inc., the Federal Trade Commission asked to redact confidential information from a letter seeking a conference about extending a temporary restraining order.

The FTC said the letter included nonpublic information and material covered by a protective order. It prepared a public redacted version and an unredacted version for filing under seal.

Judge Edgardo Ramos granted the request. The information identified in the request may be redacted from the public letter, and the unredacted letter may be filed under seal as to the FTC, IQVIA, and Propel.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Federal Trade Commission v. IQVIA Holdings Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-06188
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Aug. 25, 2023

Background

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) submitted a letter-motion asking to seal portions of its request for a pre-motion conference. The conference concerned the FTC’s request to extend a temporary restraining order. The letter identified the defendants as IQVIA Holdings Inc. and Propel Media, Inc.

Request to Seal

The FTC stated that its letter contained nonpublic information, including quotations and information designated as confidential under the protective order. It also stated that two exhibits were nonpublic documents filed under seal, with a placeholder sheet to be filed publicly. The FTC prepared a redacted version for public filing and an unredacted version for filing under seal.

The FTC argued that the proposed redactions were consistent with the Second Circuit’s rules governing public access to court records. It also relied on the protective order, which required confidential information in filed materials to be filed under seal.

Ruling

The court granted the request. It allowed the information identified in the request to be redacted from the publicly available letter and allowed the unredacted version, identified as Document 129, to be filed under seal as to the FTC, IQVIA, and Propel. The court also stated that it would hear the parties’ pending requests during a telephone conference on September 6, 2023.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.