Ford v. Audrey Signs Inc.
- Clarke
- 1:21-cv-09262
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Ford v. Audrey Signs Inc., Judge Clarke reassigned the case, kept prior deadlines in place, and rescheduled a status conference.
The plaintiffs, defendants, and their counsel were affected by the reassignment, the new conference date, the continuing deadlines, and the required joint status letter.
What happened
Ford v. Audrey Signs Inc. was reassigned to Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke. The court said all prior orders, dates, and deadlines would remain in effect unless changed, except for the rescheduled status conference.
The status conference was moved from October 23, 2023, to October 31, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. and will be held remotely through Microsoft Teams. The parties must file a joint case-status letter no later than one week before the conference.
Judge Clarke ordered the letter to address counsel, the case and defenses, jurisdiction and venue, deadlines, conferences, motions, appeals, discovery, settlement discussions, alternative dispute resolution, estimated trial length, and other information relevant to moving the case forward. This order did not decide the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Ford v. Audrey Signs Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-09262
- Clarke
- Aug. 28, 2023
What the order did
The case was reassigned to Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke. The court directed that all prior orders, dates, and deadlines would remain in effect unless the court later ordered otherwise. The court identified one exception: the status conference previously scheduled for October 23, 2023, was rescheduled to October 31, 2023, at 2:00 p.m., to be held remotely through Microsoft Teams.
Required joint letter
The parties were ordered to file a joint letter on the electronic docket no later than one week before the status conference. The letter may not exceed five pages, subject to any appendix containing lengthy citizenship information. It must provide updated information about counsel, the nature and major issues of the case, the basis for federal jurisdiction and venue, existing deadlines, scheduled conferences, outstanding motions, appeals, completed and remaining discovery, settlement discussions, possible alternative dispute resolution, estimated trial length, and other information that could help move the case toward settlement or trial.
Other instructions and effect
If the case had already been settled or otherwise terminated, counsel would not need to file the letter or attend the conference if proof of termination was filed on the docket before the deadline. Requests to extend deadlines or adjourn the conference had to be made by letter-motion filed on the electronic docket at least 48 hours before the relevant deadline or conference and had to include the information specified by the court.
This was a case-management and scheduling order. It did not decide the merits of the claims brought by Ethan Ryan Ford and Emilio Gomez, including claims asserted on behalf of Fair Labor Standards Act collective plaintiffs and a class.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.