Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 29, 2023

Garcia v. IL Postino, Inc.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:23-cv-04053
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaEmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Garcia v. Il Postino, Judge Abrams granted the parties’ joint request to stay deadlines while they prepared an FLSA settlement for court approval.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and defendants in Garcia v. Il Postino, Inc.; the order paused the case deadlines while they prepared settlement-approval materials.

What happened

In Garcia v. Il Postino, the parties jointly asked the court to pause all case deadlines after reaching a settlement at court-annexed mediation. The case involved claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The parties said they were preparing a settlement agreement and a request for court approval. They asked for a new deadline of September 14, 2023, to submit those materials.

Judge Ronnie Abrams granted the request and ordered the deadlines stayed. The opinion does not say that the settlement itself was approved.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Garcia v. IL Postino, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-04053
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Aug. 29, 2023

Background

The plaintiff and defendants jointly submitted a letter motion. They reported that they had reached a settlement at court-annexed mediation earlier that week. The case included claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing matters such as minimum wages and overtime.

Request

The parties asked the court to stay, or pause, all existing deadlines while they prepared a settlement agreement and a motion seeking court approval. They requested September 14, 2023, as the deadline for submitting the settlement documents. The letter referenced the requirement for court review of Fair Labor Standards Act settlements under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.

Ruling

Judge Ronnie Abrams granted the application and ordered it approved. The order stayed all existing deadlines and set September 14, 2023, as the requested deadline for submitting the settlement documents. The opinion does not state that the court approved the settlement itself.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.