Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 30, 2023

Rhone v. Gomez Western Wear, LLC

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:23-cv-07581
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Rhone v. Gomez Western Wear, Judge Rochon ordered the parties to discuss settlement and standing, then report whether to settle, mediate, or request an initial status conference.

Who this affects

Tonimarie Rhone and Gomez Western Wear, LLC, who must meet, discuss settlement and standing, and submit a joint letter under the court’s deadlines.

What happened

In Rhone v. Gomez Western Wear, LLC, the court ordered Tonimarie Rhone and Gomez Western Wear, LLC to meet and confer within 30 days after the summons and complaint were served. They must spend at least one hour making a good-faith effort to settle the case and discuss whether Rhone meets the legal requirement of standing to bring the action.

If the parties cannot settle on their own, they must also discuss whether further settlement discussions through court-connected mediation or before a magistrate judge would be useful at that time. Within 15 more days, they must send the court a joint letter stating whether they settled.

If the case is not settled, the joint letter must ask the court either to refer the case to mediation or a magistrate judge for a settlement conference, while stating which option the parties prefer, or to schedule an initial status conference. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon issued the order on August 30, 2023.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rhone v. Gomez Western Wear, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-07581
Judge
Rochon
Date
Aug. 30, 2023

Order

The court entered a case-management and settlement order requiring the parties to meet and confer within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint. The parties must meet for at least one hour and make a good-faith effort to settle the action.

Standing Issue

During those discussions, the parties must consider whether the plaintiff has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing—the legal requirement that a person be entitled to bring a case in court. The order cites Second Circuit decisions addressing standing.

Further Deadlines and Options

If the parties cannot settle themselves, they must discuss whether additional settlement discussions through the district court’s court-annexed mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at that time. Within 15 additional days, or 45 days after service of the summons and complaint, the parties must submit a joint letter telling the court whether they settled.

If they have not settled, the joint letter must request either referral to mediation or to a magistrate judge for a settlement conference, and state a preference between those options, or an initial status conference. The opinion does not decide the standing issue or any other underlying claim.

Judge

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon issued the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.