Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 31, 2023

A.D. v. New York City Department of Education

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:23-cv-02177
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In A.D. v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Abrams closed the settled case without costs, allowing restoration within 30 days.

Who this affects

A.D., acting on behalf of C.S., and the New York City Department of Education. The case was closed after the reported settlement, subject to a possible application to restore it within 30 days.

What happened

A.D., acting for her child C.S., sued the New York City Department of Education. The court was told that the case had been settled, but the opinion does not describe the settlement or the underlying claims.

The court discontinued the case without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it within 30 days. It directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. Any request to enforce the settlement through the court had to be put on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period.

Judge Ronnie Abrams issued the order on August 31, 2023. The order did not decide the underlying dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
A.D. v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:23-cv-02177
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Aug. 31, 2023

Background

A.D., on behalf of her child, C.S., sued the New York City Department of Education. The court stated that it had been informed that the case was settled. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms or explain the underlying legal claims.

Order

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s docket if an application to restore was made within 30 days. It stated that an application to reopen filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late. The court also stated that, if the parties wanted it to retain authority to enforce the settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

Effect

This order ended the case based on the reported settlement and did not decide the underlying dispute. Judge Ronnie Abrams signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.