Bernheim v. New York City Department of Education
- Lewis Liman
- 1:23-cv-07557
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Bernheim v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Liman ordered U.S. Marshals service on three defendants.
Laura Bernheim, the New York City Department of Education, Melissa Harrow, Michael Abbey, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.
What happened
In Bernheim v. New York City Department of Education, Laura Bernheim, who is representing herself, alleges that her employer discriminated and retaliated against her because of her age and disability under federal, New York State, and New York City laws.
The court had allowed Bernheim to proceed without paying filing fees in advance. Because of that status, the court said the Clerk and U.S. Marshals Service must handle service of the lawsuit.
Judge Liman ordered the Clerk to issue summonses and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve the New York City Department of Education, Melissa Harrow, and Michael Abbey. The order did not decide whether Bernheim’s discrimination or retaliation claims were valid.
The detailed version
- Bernheim v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:23-cv-07557
- Lewis Liman
- Sept. 1, 2023
Background
Laura Bernheim is proceeding without a lawyer and brings claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. She alleges that her employer discriminated and retaliated against her based on her age and disability.
In an order dated August 28, 2023, the court granted Bernheim permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees. In cases with that status, federal law requires the court to arrange service through the U.S. Marshals Service.
Order
The court instructed the Clerk of Court to complete U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return forms, issue summonses, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service for service on the New York City Department of Education, Melissa Harrow, and Michael Abbey.
The court explained that service must occur within 90 days after the summonses are issued. If service is not completed within that period, Bernheim should request more time. The court also directed Bernheim to notify the court in writing if her address changes and stated that the action may be dismissed if she fails to do so. The Clerk was directed to mail Bernheim an information package.
Effect
This is an order concerning service of process, not a decision on the merits of Bernheim’s discrimination or retaliation claims. The opinion’s body and conclusion identify the third individual defendant as “Michael Abbey,” while the service-address section identifies that person as “Michal Abbey.”
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.