Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 5, 2023

Davenport v. Sollis Health, P.C.

Judge
Clarke
Docket
1:22-cv-05753
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Davenport v. Sollis Health, Judge Clarke ordered the parties to submit settlement terms and supporting information before approving their Fair Labor Standards Act settlement.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants in the Davenport v. Sollis Health, P.C. settlement, including the parties' attorneys if the agreement includes attorney's fees.

What happened

In Davenport v. Sollis Health, the parties told the court they had reached a settlement in a case under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage law.

The court explained that these claims cannot be privately settled without approval from the court or the Department of Labor. It must decide whether the agreement is fair and reasonable, including by considering the possible recovery, litigation burdens and risks, bargaining process, and potential fraud or collusion.

Judge Clarke ordered the parties to provide the settlement terms within 30 days, along with a joint letter of no more than five pages explaining why the agreement is fair and reasonable. The parties must also provide billing records supporting any attorney-fee request and legal support for any release, confidentiality, or non-disparagement provision.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Davenport v. Sollis Health, P.C. · No. 1:22-cv-05753
Judge
Clarke
Date
Sept. 5, 2023

Background

The court was advised that the parties had reached a settlement in this Fair Labor Standards Act case. The opinion does not state the settlement amount or the specific terms of the agreement.

Legal standard

The court explained that parties may not privately settle Fair Labor Standards Act claims without approval from the district court or the Department of Labor. The court must determine whether the settlement is fair and reasonable by considering the total circumstances, including the plaintiff's possible recovery, the burdens and expenses the settlement may avoid, the litigation risks, whether experienced counsel negotiated at arm's length, and the possibility of fraud or collusion.

If the agreement includes attorney's fees, the court must separately assess whether those fees are reasonable. Counsel must provide evidence supporting the requested fees, including contemporaneous billing records showing each attorney's date of work, hours spent, and the nature of the work. The court must also closely examine any release, confidentiality, or non-disparagement provision.

Order

Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke ordered the parties to provide the settlement terms within 30 days. The parties must submit a joint letter of no more than five pages explaining why the settlement is a fair and reasonable compromise of disputed issues and addressing the identified factors. If the agreement includes attorney's fees, they must provide supporting evidence. If it includes a release, confidentiality provision, or non-disparagement provision, they must provide support for each provision, including citations to relevant case law. The order required these submissions; the opinion does not state that the court approved the settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.