Davenport v. Sollis Health, P.C.
- Clarke
- 1:22-cv-05753
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Davenport v. Sollis Health, Judge Clarke ordered the parties to submit settlement terms and supporting information before approving their Fair Labor Standards Act settlement.
The plaintiffs and defendants in the Davenport v. Sollis Health, P.C. settlement, including the parties' attorneys if the agreement includes attorney's fees.
What happened
In Davenport v. Sollis Health, the parties told the court they had reached a settlement in a case under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage law.
The court explained that these claims cannot be privately settled without approval from the court or the Department of Labor. It must decide whether the agreement is fair and reasonable, including by considering the possible recovery, litigation burdens and risks, bargaining process, and potential fraud or collusion.
Judge Clarke ordered the parties to provide the settlement terms within 30 days, along with a joint letter of no more than five pages explaining why the agreement is fair and reasonable. The parties must also provide billing records supporting any attorney-fee request and legal support for any release, confidentiality, or non-disparagement provision.
The detailed version
- Davenport v. Sollis Health, P.C. · No. 1:22-cv-05753
- Clarke
- Sept. 5, 2023
Background
The court was advised that the parties had reached a settlement in this Fair Labor Standards Act case. The opinion does not state the settlement amount or the specific terms of the agreement.
Legal standard
The court explained that parties may not privately settle Fair Labor Standards Act claims without approval from the district court or the Department of Labor. The court must determine whether the settlement is fair and reasonable by considering the total circumstances, including the plaintiff's possible recovery, the burdens and expenses the settlement may avoid, the litigation risks, whether experienced counsel negotiated at arm's length, and the possibility of fraud or collusion.
If the agreement includes attorney's fees, the court must separately assess whether those fees are reasonable. Counsel must provide evidence supporting the requested fees, including contemporaneous billing records showing each attorney's date of work, hours spent, and the nature of the work. The court must also closely examine any release, confidentiality, or non-disparagement provision.
Order
Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke ordered the parties to provide the settlement terms within 30 days. The parties must submit a joint letter of no more than five pages explaining why the settlement is a fair and reasonable compromise of disputed issues and addressing the identified factors. If the agreement includes attorney's fees, they must provide supporting evidence. If it includes a release, confidentiality provision, or non-disparagement provision, they must provide support for each provision, including citations to relevant case law. The order required these submissions; the opinion does not state that the court approved the settlement.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.