Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Sept. 11, 2023

James v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:22-cv-09566
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Social Security
In one sentence

James v. Kijakazi: Judge Liman reversed the Social Security decision and ordered further proceedings, including a new hearing and decision.

Who this affects

Susan Prisca James will receive the opportunity for a new hearing and a new decision from the Social Security Commissioner.

What happened

In Susan Prisca James v. Kilolo Kijakazi, the court addressed the Social Security Commissioner’s decision concerning James. The judgment does not describe the underlying dispute or the reasons for reversal.

The court reversed the Commissioner’s decision and sent the case back for further administrative proceedings. On remand, the Commissioner must offer James a new hearing and issue a new decision.

Judge Lewis Liman is identified as the judge in the case. The judgment was entered on September 11, 2023, based on a stipulation and order dated September 8, 2023.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
James v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:22-cv-09566
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Sept. 11, 2023

Background

Susan Prisca James sued Kilolo Kijakazi, identified in the caption as the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. The judgment refers to the reasons stated in the parties’ Stipulation and Order dated September 8, 2023, but does not explain those reasons or describe the underlying claims.

Ruling

The court reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded, or sent the case back, to the Commissioner under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. The Commissioner must offer James the opportunity for a new hearing and issue a new decision. The judgment cites Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.