Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 15, 2023

Apman v. City of New York

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:23-cv-04226
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
6
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Apman v. City of New York, Judge Furman set discovery and pretrial deadlines without deciding the claims.

Who this affects

Keith Apman, the City of New York, and their counsel are affected by the scheduling, discovery, settlement, motion, and pretrial requirements.

What happened

Apman v. City of New York is at the case-management stage. The parties submitted a plan under the federal rule governing their initial planning conference, and the court canceled the September 27, 2023 conference.

The order set October 27, 2023, as the deadline for motions to amend the pleadings or add parties and for initial document requests and certain interrogatories. Fact discovery must finish by January 25, 2024. The parties estimated that trial would last three to four days, and the next pretrial conference was scheduled for January 31, 2024.

Judge Jesse Furman entered the scheduling order on September 15, 2023. The order establishes procedures and deadlines for discovery, settlement discussions, motions, and trial preparation; it does not decide the parties’ underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Apman v. City of New York · No. 1:23-cv-04226
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Sept. 15, 2023

Nature of the order

The court entered a Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order based on the parties’ submission under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f)(3). This is a scheduling and case-management order, not a decision on the merits of the claims.

Deadlines and discovery

The deadline for any motion to amend the pleadings or add parties is October 27, 2023. The order also sets October 27, 2023, as the deadline for initial requests for production of documents and certain interrogatories. Fact discovery must be completed by January 25, 2024. The parties must follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Southern District of New York’s local rules, and the court’s individual rules.

The order explains procedures for depositions, requests to admit, contention interrogatories, expert discovery if applicable, and discovery disputes. Before bringing a discovery dispute to the court, the parties must meet and confer in person or by telephone. If that effort fails, the party may file a letter-motion of no more than three pages requesting an informal conference. Counsel must also meet in person for at least one hour to discuss settlement within fourteen days after fact discovery closes.

Motions and trial preparation

Absent good cause, the court will not have summary-judgment practice in a non-jury case. Any applicable summary-judgment motion or motion to exclude expert testimony must be filed within thirty days after the later of the close of fact discovery or expert discovery. The parties must submit a proposed joint pretrial order within thirty days after discovery closes, or within thirty days after a decision on a dispositive motion if one is filed. The parties estimated a trial length of three to four days. The order does not clearly show the selected jury-trial option in the provided text.

Other scheduling rulings

The parties were directed to file a joint letter by December 18, 2023, stating whether they wanted a referral to the assigned magistrate judge or the court’s mediation program for settlement purposes. The next pretrial conference was scheduled for January 31, 2024, at 9:00 a.m., presumptively by telephone. The order states that its deadlines may be changed only by further court order for good cause, subject to the specified exception for certain interim discovery deadlines. The clerk was directed to terminate ECF No. 12.

Disposition and effect

Judge Furman ordered the parties to follow the stated case-management schedule. The court did not grant or deny a merits motion, resolve liability, or determine the validity of any claim or defense. The order therefore affects the parties’ litigation schedule and counsel’s discovery and pretrial obligations while the case proceeds.

The authoritative version

Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.