Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 15, 2023

Crespo v. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:23-cv-07304
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureEmploymentPro Se
In one sentence

In Crespo v. Kramer Levin, Judge Caproni ordered Marshals service after Crespo was allowed to proceed without paying court fees.

Who this affects

Yajaira V. Crespo, who is proceeding without a lawyer and without paying court fees, and Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, which is to be served through the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

Crespo v. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP is a lawsuit in which Yajaira V. Crespo, representing herself, alleges that her employer discriminated and retaliated against her because of her sex, race, and national origin under federal, state, and city laws.

The court had allowed Crespo to proceed without paying court fees. Because of that, the court said Crespo could rely on the U.S. Marshals Service to deliver the summons and complaint to Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued.

Judge Valerie Caproni ordered the Clerk of Court to issue the summons, prepare the service paperwork, and send the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The order did not decide whether Crespo’s discrimination or retaliation claims were valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Crespo v. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP · No. 1:23-cv-07304
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Sept. 15, 2023

Background

Yajaira V. Crespo brought this action against Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. She alleges that her employer discriminated and retaliated against her based on sex, race, and national origin. Crespo is proceeding without a lawyer.

The court had granted Crespo permission to proceed without paying court fees. In such cases, federal law requires the court to order service of the lawsuit’s papers through the U.S. Marshals Service.

Service Order

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons for Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, complete the U.S. Marshals Service process form with the defendant’s address, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve the defendant.

The court explained that the usual 90-day service period runs from the date the complaint is filed, but Crespo could not serve the summons and complaint before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered the summons issued. The court therefore extended the service period to 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed within that period, Crespo should ask for more time. The court also directed Crespo to notify it in writing if her address changes and warned that the action could be dismissed if she does not do so.

Ruling and Effect

Judge Valerie Caproni entered an order of service. The order concerns how the defendant will receive the lawsuit papers; it does not rule on the merits of Crespo’s discrimination or retaliation allegations.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.