Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. South Island Installers Inc.
- Subramanian
- 1:23-cv-08045
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Trustees of the New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund v. South Island Installers Inc., Judge Subramanian set briefing and service deadlines without deciding confirmation.
The petitioners and South Island Installers Inc.; the order sets their filing, opposition, reply, and service deadlines.
What happened
In Trustees of the New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund, et al. v. South Island Installers Inc., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion does not describe the award or the parties’ underlying dispute.
The court ordered the petitioners to file any additional supporting materials by October 6, 2023. South Island Installers Inc.’s opposition, if any, was due October 27, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, was due November 3. The petitioners also had to serve the petition, supporting papers, and order under Rule 4 by October 6 and file proof of service by October 7.
Judge Arun Subramanian issued a scheduling order and did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.
The detailed version
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:23-cv-08045
- Subramanian
- Sept. 15, 2023
Background
On September 11, 2023, the petitioners filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion does not provide details about the arbitration, the award, or the underlying dispute.
Order
The court stated that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment. It ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional materials supporting confirmation by October 6, 2023. The respondent’s opposition, if any, was due October 27, 2023, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, was due November 3, 2023.
The court also required the petitioners to serve the petition, all supporting papers, and the order on the respondent under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by October 6, 2023. The petitioners had to file an affidavit showing service by October 7, 2023.
Disposition and Classification
Judge Arun Subramanian entered an order setting briefing and service deadlines. The court did not rule on whether the arbitration award should be confirmed. This is a procedural order because it addresses case-management and filing requirements rather than the merits of confirmation.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.