Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 19, 2023

Dougherty v. 2With Deli, Corp.

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:23-cv-03496
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Dougherty v. 2With Deli, Judge Ramos directed the parties to submit their settlement agreement for review after reaching agreement on all issues.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants were directed to submit their settlement agreement for court review.

What happened

In Dougherty v. 2With Deli, the court said the mediator reported that the parties had reached an agreement on all issues.

The court directed the parties to submit their settlement agreement for review by October 3, 2023. The opinion does not describe the claims or the settlement’s terms.

Judge Edgardo Ramos entered the order on September 19, 2023, directing the parties to submit the agreement for review under the applicable Second Circuit settlement-review requirement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Dougherty v. 2With Deli, Corp. · No. 1:23-cv-03496
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Sept. 19, 2023

Background

Michelle Dougherty brought the case individually and on behalf of others similarly situated against 2With Deli, Corp. and Andrew Wengrover. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims.

Court’s Action

The court stated that it had received the mediator’s report and that the parties had reached agreement on all issues. It directed the parties to submit their settlement agreement for court review under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015), by October 3, 2023.

Disposition

Judge Edgardo Ramos ordered the parties to submit the settlement agreement for review. The order does not approve or reject the settlement, and it does not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.