Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 20, 2023

Joachin v. Morningside Rehabilitation Nursing Home

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:23-cv-07652
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Joachin v. Morningside Rehabilitation Nursing Home, Judge Carter ordered Marshals service for the pro se plaintiff but denied IFP status for any appeal.

Who this affects

Nadine Joachin and Morningside Rehabilitation Nursing Home; the Clerk of Court and U.S. Marshals Service were directed to carry out service.

What happened

In Joachin v. Morningside Rehabilitation Nursing Home, Nadine Joachin, who is representing herself, brings federal and state employment-discrimination claims. The court had already allowed her to proceed without paying filing fees in advance.

Because Joachin was proceeding without prepaying fees, the court directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons and provide the U.S. Marshals Service with the documents and address needed to serve Morningside Rehabilitation Nursing Home. Service must be completed within 90 days after the summons is issued, unless Joachin requests more time. She must also notify the court in writing if her address changes.

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. ordered the Clerk to issue the summons, complete the service paperwork, and mail Joachin an information package. The court also certified that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The order did not decide the employment-discrimination claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Joachin v. Morningside Rehabilitation Nursing Home · No. 1:23-cv-07652
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Sept. 20, 2023

Background

Nadine Joachin filed this action pro se, meaning without a lawyer. She asserts claims under federal and state employment-discrimination statutes. In an earlier order dated August 30, 2023, the court granted her permission to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning without prepaying court fees.

Service of Process

Because Joachin was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court explained that she could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The court therefore directed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form, issue a summons for Morningside Rehabilitation Nursing Home, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service.

The court stated that service must occur within 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed by then, Joachin should request an extension of time. The court also instructed Joachin to notify it in writing if her address changes and stated that the action may be dismissed if she fails to do so.

Ruling

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. ordered the Clerk to issue the summons, complete the service form with the defendant’s address, provide the documents to the U.S. Marshals Service, and mail Joachin an information package. The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The order did not resolve the merits of Joachin’s employment-discrimination claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.