Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 20, 2023

Johnson v. City of New York

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:23-cv-05378
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Johnson v. City of New York, Judge Furman ordered briefing on service before resolving Johnson’s default-judgment motion and adjourned the conference.

Who this affects

Sean Johnson, the defendants, and the New York City Law Department, which the order identifies as the Corporation Counsel.

What happened

In Johnson v. City of New York, Sean Johnson asked the court to enter a default judgment against the defendants. The court explained that it could not enter a default judgment unless the defendants had been properly served with the lawsuit.

The court ordered Johnson to submit a letter brief about whether service was proper by September 27, 2023. It also required him to serve the letter brief on the New York City Law Department by September 28 and file proof of that service by September 29. The order did not grant or deny the default-judgment motion.

The court also noted repeated filing problems and adjourned the initial pretrial conference from October 5 to December 7, 2023. Judge Jesse M. Furman issued the order on September 20, 2023.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Johnson v. City of New York · No. 1:23-cv-05378
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Sept. 20, 2023

Background

On September 16, 2023, Sean Johnson filed a motion seeking a default judgment under Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Southern District of New York’s Local Civil Rule 55.2(b). A default judgment is a judgment requested because a defendant has not responded or otherwise defended the case.

Service of Process

The court stated that it could not properly enter a default judgment unless it had jurisdiction over the defendants, which required each defendant to have been effectively served with the lawsuit. The court directed Johnson to submit, no later than September 27, 2023, a letter brief addressing whether service on the defendants was proper. The order cited Rule 4(e), which concerns methods for serving individuals.

Johnson was also ordered to serve a copy of the letter brief on the New York City Law Department, identified in the order as the Corporation Counsel, by September 28, 2023. He had to file proof of that service by September 29, 2023.

Other Directions and Disposition

The court noted that Johnson had repeatedly filed documents incorrectly through the court’s electronic filing system, resulting in multiple deficiency notices from the Clerk’s Office. It directed counsel to ensure that future filings complied with the court’s electronic filing rules and that deficiency notices were promptly addressed.

The court adjourned the initial pretrial conference, previously scheduled for October 5, 2023, to December 7, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. The opinion orders additional briefing and changes the conference date; it does not state that the court granted or denied the default-judgment motion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.