Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 21, 2023

Perry v. Robles

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-07696
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In Perry v. Robles, Judge Swain dismissed a duplicate civil-rights complaint without prejudice to the pending case and waived this action’s filing fee.

Who this affects

Kahreem Perry, David Robles, and Yvette Agosto; the Clerk of Court and the official holding Perry in custody were also directed to take specified actions concerning the filing fee and prison-account funds.

What happened

In Perry v. Robles, Kahreem Perry, who is incarcerated and representing himself, filed a civil-rights lawsuit against David Robles and Yvette Agosto. He alleged that the defendants abused the judicial process, leading to his arrest.

The court found that Perry had already filed the same complaint against the same defendants in a case still pending under docket number 23-CV-7492. Because this lawsuit repeated the claims in that case, the court dismissed it without prejudice to Perry’s pending case.

Judge Swain directed the Clerk of Court not to charge Perry the $350 filing fee and barred deductions from his prison trust account for this lawsuit. She also denied fee-free status for any appeal, found that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and directed the Clerk to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perry v. Robles · No. 1:23-cv-07696
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 21, 2023

Background

Kahreem Perry, who is incarcerated at the Otis Bantum Correctional Center and is representing himself, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal civil-rights statute. He alleged that David Robles and Yvette Agosto abused the judicial process and that he was arrested as a result.

Reason for dismissal

The court stated that Perry had previously submitted the same complaint against the same defendants in an earlier related proceeding, which remained pending under docket number 23-CV-7492. Because the newly filed action raised the same claims, the court concluded that filing and litigating this duplicate lawsuit would serve no useful purpose.

Ruling and other orders

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice to Perry’s pending case under docket number 23-CV-7492. The court directed the Clerk of Court not to charge Perry the $350 filing fee for this action, and directed that funds not be deducted or encumbered from his prison trust account for this lawsuit.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal. It also directed the Clerk to enter judgment in the action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.