Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 26, 2023

Zambrano v. Jermyn Contracting Corp.

Judge
Cathy Seibel
Docket
7:22-cv-03131
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaEmploymentFee Petition
In one sentence

In Zambrano v. Jermyn Contracting Corp., Judge Seibel entered a $175,555.37 judgment for unpaid overtime and related damages after defendants’ default.

Who this affects

Francisco Zambrano and Jamie Huayllasaca, who were awarded damages, fees, and costs, and the named defendants, who were held jointly and severally responsible for the judgment.

What happened

In Zambrano v. Jermyn Contracting Corp., Francisco Zambrano and Jamie Huayllasaca sought damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The court considered damages after the defendants’ default.

A magistrate judge recommended the damages award. Because no party objected, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.

Judge Seibel adopted the recommendation and directed entry of a $175,555.37 judgment against the defendants jointly and severally. The award included unpaid overtime, liquidated damages, prejudgment interest, wage-statement damages, attorney’s fees, and costs, with a possible 15% increase if specified amounts remain unpaid after the applicable 90-day period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Zambrano v. Jermyn Contracting Corp. · No. 7:22-cv-03131
Judge
Cathy Seibel
Date
Sept. 26, 2023

Background

The court considered a Report and Recommendation from Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy concerning damages owed to the plaintiffs after the defendants’ default. The claims arose under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage law, and the New York Labor Law.

No objections were filed. Judge Seibel therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake, and found no error. She adopted the recommendation as the court’s decision.

Ruling and Judgment

The Clerk of Court was directed to enter judgment against the defendants jointly and severally for a total of $175,555.37 and then close the case. The components were:

- $23,280.00 in unpaid overtime to Zambrano; - $39,600.00 in unpaid overtime to Huayllacasa; - $23,280.00 in liquidated damages to Zambrano; - $39,600.00 in liquidated damages to Huayllacasa; - $8,013.04 in prejudgment interest to Zambrano; - $18,085.28 in prejudgment interest to Huayllacasa; - $10,000.00 in statutory damages for wage-statement violations to Zambrano; - $5,000.00 in statutory damages for wage-statement violations to Huayllacasa; - $7,441.00 in attorney’s fees; and - $1,256.05 in costs.

The judgment would automatically increase by 15% if any amount remained unpaid after 90 days following issuance of judgment, or after 90 days following expiration of the appeal period if no appeal was pending, whichever was later. The order directed the Clerk to enter judgment and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.