Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 27, 2023

Valentine Shabazz v. Bruce

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-07849
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureIntellectual PropertyPro Se
In one sentence

In Danny Amen Anderson Valentine Shabazz v. Chris Bruce, Judge Swain transferred the copyright case to Delaware because venue was improper and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

Who this affects

Danny Amen Anderson Valentine Shabazz’s case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the District of Delaware. The defendants remain parties to the transferred case, and the Delaware court will address any pending motions.

What happened

Danny Amen Anderson Valentine Shabazz, representing himself without a lawyer, filed a copyright-infringement case against Chris Bruce, Cerron Cade, Nick Sabean, Jeff Flynn, and Delaware Governor John Carney. The case is Danny Amen Anderson Valentine Shabazz v. Chris Bruce.

The court said the defendants appeared to reside or be found in Delaware, and Shabazz alleged no facts showing that they or their agents were in New York. It therefore concluded that the Southern District of New York was not the proper venue, while the District of Delaware was a proper venue.

Judge Swain transferred the case to the District of Delaware rather than dismissing it. The Delaware court will decide whether to grant relief on pending motions; summonses will not issue from the New York court. The court also denied Shabazz fee-free status for purposes of an appeal, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Valentine Shabazz v. Bruce · No. 1:23-cv-07849
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 27, 2023

Background

Danny Amen Anderson Valentine Shabazz filed the action without a lawyer and said he was asserting copyright-infringement claims. He sued Chris Bruce, Cerron Cade, Nick Sabean, Jeff Flynn, and John Carney, identified in the opinion as the Governor of Delaware. Shabazz also filed additional submissions and what appeared to be two motions, which the court treated as supplements to his initial pleading. The court had previously granted his request to proceed without paying the filing fee.

Venue analysis

The court applied the copyright venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(a), which allows a copyright-infringement action to be filed in a district where a defendant or the defendant’s agent resides or may be found. The opinion states that all defendants appeared to reside or be found in Delaware. It also states that Shabazz alleged no facts showing that any defendant or agent resided or could be found in New York, including the Southern District of New York.

Because the New York court appeared to be an improper venue and the District of Delaware was clearly a proper venue, the court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). That statute allows a court to dismiss a case filed in the wrong venue or, when justice requires, transfer it to a district where it could have been filed.

Order

The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The transfer order did not decide whether copyright infringement occurred or whether Shabazz was entitled to relief on his claims. The court left any decision on the pending motions to the Delaware court, directed that summonses not issue from the New York court, and stated that the order closed the action in the Southern District of New York.

The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Shabazz’s fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.