Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 27, 2023

Vuppala v. 1411 Broadway Garage LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:22-cv-08821
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Vuppala v. 1411 Broadway Garage LLC, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by October 27, 2023.

Who this affects

Kiran Vuppala and defendants 1411 Broadway Garage LLC, doing business as City Parking, and 1411 IC-SIC Property LLC.

What happened

In Vuppala v. 1411 Broadway Garage LLC, the plaintiff told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and allowed it to be restored to the court’s calendar if the parties could not put their settlement in writing.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil required any application to restore the action to be made by October 27, 2023, and stated that the dismissal would be with prejudice if no such application was made by then.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Vuppala v. 1411 Broadway Garage LLC · No. 1:22-cv-08821
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Sept. 27, 2023

Background The plaintiff filed a letter informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion identifies the defendants as 1411 Broadway Garage LLC, doing business as City Parking, and 1411 IC-SIC Property LLC.

Ruling The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. The order required any application to restore the action to be made by October 27, 2023. It further states that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Effect The order ended the action based on the parties’ settlement in principle, while preserving a limited opportunity to seek restoration if the settlement could not be put in writing. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.