Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 28, 2023

Toro v. Anthonys, Inc.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:23-cv-05311
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Toro v. Anthony’s, Inc., Judge Vyskocil discontinued the settled case, allowing restoration by October 28, 2023, or dismissal with prejudice.

Who this affects

Jasmine Toro and Anthony’s, Inc., the parties to the discontinued action.

What happened

In Toro v. Anthony’s, Inc., Jasmine Toro told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the case without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it if the parties could not put their settlement in writing. Any request to restore the case had to be made by October 28, 2023.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no request to restore the case was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Toro v. Anthonys, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-05311
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Sept. 28, 2023

Background

Jasmine Toro filed the action against Anthony’s, Inc. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims. Toro informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. The application to restore the action had to be made by October 28, 2023. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Effect

The order ended the action subject to the stated restoration condition. The opinion does not state whether the settlement was later put in writing or whether the case was restored.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.