Smith v. City of New York
- Rochon
- 1:23-cv-08229
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Smith v. City of New York, Judge Rochon ordered service through the U.S. Marshals Service after allowing Myra S. Smith to proceed without prepaid fees.
Myra S. Smith and the City of New York; the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service were directed to carry out service-related tasks.
What happened
Myra S. Smith, proceeding without a lawyer, sued the City of New York under several employment-discrimination laws. She alleges that her employer discriminated and retaliated against her because of her race, color, and age.
Because the court had allowed Smith to proceed without paying filing fees in advance, it ordered the Clerk of Court to issue a summons and provide the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Marshals Service will serve the City of New York.
The court did not decide whether Smith’s claims are valid. The order requires service within 90 days after the summons is issued, subject to a possible extension, and Judge Jennifer L. Rochon also directed the Clerk to mail Smith an information package.
The detailed version
- Smith v. City of New York · No. 1:23-cv-08229
- Rochon
- Sept. 29, 2023
Background
Myra S. Smith filed a case against the City of New York without a lawyer. She asserts claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. She alleges that her employer discriminated and retaliated against her based on race, color, and age.
In an earlier order dated September 27, 2023, the court allowed Smith to proceed without paying filing fees in advance. That status permits her to rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant.
Order
The court instructed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for the City of New York, issue a summons, and deliver the summons and other necessary papers to the Marshals Service for service. The order also directs the Clerk to mail Smith an information package.
The court explained that service generally must occur within 90 days, but because Smith was proceeding without prepaid fees and could not serve the papers before the court issued the summons, the relevant 90-day period begins when the summons is issued. If the complaint is not served within that period, Smith should request additional time. The court also stated that Smith must notify it in writing if her address changes and that the case may be dismissed if she fails to do so.
Effect of the Order
This was an order concerning service of process—the formal delivery of the lawsuit papers to the defendant. It did not decide the merits of Smith’s discrimination or retaliation claims. The court ordered the Clerk and the Marshals Service to take the steps needed to serve the City of New York.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.