Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 4, 2023

Cevallos v. Mangia 23rd Street LLC

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:23-cv-03625
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Cevallos v. Mangia 23rd Street LLC, Judge Cronan ordered settlement materials after the parties reached an agreement during court mediation.

Who this affects

The parties to the case, including Pedro Cevallos and the defendants, were required to submit any settlement requiring court approval and other necessary information by October 19, 2023.

What happened

In Cevallos v. Mangia 23rd Street LLC, Pedro Cevallos sued Mangia 23rd Street LLC and other defendants on behalf of himself and similarly situated people. The opinion does not describe the claims or the settlement terms.

The parties told the court that they had reached an agreement on all issues while participating in the court’s mediation program. The court did not state that it approved the settlement.

Judge John P. Cronan ordered the parties to submit any settlement requiring court approval, along with any other necessary information, by October 19, 2023.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cevallos v. Mangia 23rd Street LLC · No. 1:23-cv-03625
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Oct. 4, 2023

Background

Pedro Cevallos brought the case on behalf of himself and all others described in the caption as similarly situated. The defendants included Mangia 23rd Street LLC and other defendants. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims.

Settlement

The court was informed that the parties reached an agreement on all issues while participating in the court-annexed Mediation Program. The order does not disclose the agreement’s terms or state whether the court had approved it.

Order

Judge John P. Cronan ordered the parties to submit by October 19, 2023, any settlement requiring court approval under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, along with any other necessary information. This order addressed the settlement-submission process and did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.