Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 6, 2023

Ison v. Kachappilly

Judge
Nelson Roman
Docket
7:23-cv-03402
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Ison v. Kachappilly, Judge Roman ordered service on newly identified defendant Roa Rosario in Ison’s pro se federal case.

Who this affects

Jerry Ison, Roa Rosario, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

Ison v. Kachappilly is a lawsuit brought by Jerry Ison without a lawyer under federal civil-rights and disability laws. The court had previously allowed Ison to proceed without paying filing fees and had directed the New York State Attorney General to identify a nurse administrator originally listed as “Jane Doe.”

After receiving information from the Attorney General, the court identified that defendant as Roa Rosario. It directed the Clerk of Court to add Rosario to the case, prepare a summons and service paperwork, and give the documents to the U.S. Marshals Service so Rosario could be served.

Judge Nelson S. Roman also directed the Clerk to mail the order to Ison and record that mailing on the docket. The order states that Ison should request more time if service is not completed within 90 days after the summons is issued and warns that the case could be dismissed if he does not keep the court informed of address changes.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ison v. Kachappilly · No. 7:23-cv-03402
Judge
Nelson Roman
Date
Oct. 6, 2023

Background

Jerry Ison, who is incarcerated at Orleans Correctional Facility, brought this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. The court had allowed Ison to proceed without prepaying filing fees. Because of that status, the court explained that Ison could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to carry out service of process.

The complaint named a “Jane Doe, Nurse Administrator.” In an earlier order, the court directed the New York State Attorney General to identify that person. The Attorney General provided information identifying the person as Roa Rosario.

Order

The court directed the Clerk of Court to add Roa Rosario as a defendant in the caption and on the docket. To permit service through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk was directed to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form, prepare a summons, and deliver the summons and other necessary documents to the Marshals Service for service at Sing Sing Correctional Facility.

The Clerk was also directed to mail a copy of the order to Ison and record the mailing on the docket. The order states that if the complaint is not served within 90 days after the summonses are issued, Ison should request an extension of time. It also states that Ison must notify the court in writing if his address changes and that the court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.

Disposition

This supplemental order addressed identifying and serving a previously unnamed defendant. It did not decide the merits of Ison’s claims. Judge Nelson S. Roman directed the Clerk to issue the summons, complete the service form, provide the documents to the Marshals Service, and add Roa Rosario to the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.