Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 10, 2023

Poquelin, S.A. DE C.V. v. MTV Networks Latin America, Inc.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:23-cv-01922
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Poquelin v. MTV Networks, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled case without costs, allowing restoration within 30 days.

Who this affects

Poquelin, S.A. DE C.V. and MTV Networks Latin America, Inc.; the action was discontinued after the court was informed that the case had settled.

What happened

Poquelin, S.A. DE C.V. v. MTV Networks Latin America, Inc. was reported to the court as settled.

The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it if an application was made within 30 days. The clerk was directed to close the case.

Judge Ronnie Abrams also stated that any request for the court to keep authority to enforce the settlement had to place the agreement’s terms on the public record and receive the court’s approval within the same 30-day period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Poquelin, S.A. DE C.V. v. MTV Networks Latin America, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-01922
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Oct. 10, 2023

Background

The court stated that it had been informed that the case had settled. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Order

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. It stated that an application to reopen filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late. The clerk was directed to close the case.

Settlement Enforcement

The court stated that if the parties wanted it to retain authority to enforce the settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The order did not decide the underlying merits of the dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.