Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Oct. 12, 2023

Marvici v. Roche Facilities Maintenance LLC

Judge
Subramanian
Docket
1:21-cv-04259
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
EmploymentFlsaFee Petition
In one sentence

In Marvici v. Roche Facilities Maintenance, Judge Subramanian adopted damages recommendations and directed entry of judgment.

Who this affects

Plaintiffs Chiala Marvici and Fadil, and Defendants Roche Facilities Maintenance LLC and Stephen Roche.

What happened

In Marvici v. Roche Facilities Maintenance LLC, the court had already entered a default judgment against Roche Facilities Maintenance LLC and Stephen Roche. The case was then sent to a magistrate judge to determine the damages owed to the plaintiffs.

The court adopted recommendations awarding Plaintiff Marvici $57,009 and Plaintiff Fadil $4,092, with specified 9% prejudgment interest. The recommendations also included a possible 15% increase under New York law for damages unpaid 90 days after judgment, $18,194.50 in attorneys’ fees and costs, and post-judgment interest.

Because no objections were filed, Defendants waived their right to object or seek appellate review of the recommendations. Judge Arun Subramanian adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and directed the Clerk to enter judgment and close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Marvici v. Roche Facilities Maintenance LLC · No. 1:21-cv-04259
Judge
Subramanian
Date
Oct. 12, 2023

Background

The court had previously entered a default judgment against Roche Facilities Maintenance LLC and Stephen Roche. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott to conduct an inquest into damages. On September 8, 2023, Judge Cott issued a Report and Recommendation proposing damages, interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs for the plaintiffs.

Recommended Awards

The Report and Recommendation proposed:

- $57,009 for Plaintiff Marvici, including 9% prejudgment interest on $2,744.50 from November 21, 2020, through the date of final judgment; - $4,092 for Plaintiff Fadil, including 9% prejudgment interest on $2,046.40 from December 15, 2020, through the date of final judgment; - A 15% increase under the New York Labor Law if any damages remained unpaid 90 days after judgment, except for Plaintiff Marvici’s $51,520 in lost wages, which were awarded under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act; - $18,194.50 in attorneys’ fees and costs; and - Post-judgment interest calculated under 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a).

Objections and Ruling

The Report and Recommendation gave the parties 14 days after service to object and warned that failing to object on time would waive the right to object. Plaintiffs served the report on Defendants on September 28, 2023. No objections or extension request was filed.

The court held that Defendants therefore waived their right to object to the Report and Recommendation or obtain appellate review. Even so, the court reviewed the report and found it well reasoned and supported by the facts and law. Judge Arun Subramanian adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety, directed the Clerk to enter judgment, and directed that the case be closed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.