Duran v. Amsterdam 1883-1887 LLC
- Rearden
- 1:22-cv-07425
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Duran v. Amsterdam, Judge Rearden approved the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement, approved one-third attorney’s fees, and dismissed the case with prejudice.
Biondys Duran, Amsterdam 1883-1887 LLC, and Staffpro, Inc.; the case was closed after the court approved their settlement.
What happened
In Duran v. Amsterdam 1883-1887 LLC, the parties submitted a settlement in this Fair Labor Standards Act case. The court reviewed whether the agreement was fair and reasonable.
The settlement provided Biondys Duran with a significant portion of the estimated unpaid wages claimed, plus a waiver of rent and other costs valued at approximately $48,000. The court noted that Duran had counsel, the parties used the court’s mediation program, and the agreement did not include a confidentiality clause.
Judge Jennifer H. Rearden approved the settlement and attorney’s fees equal to one-third of the recovered amount. The case was dismissed with prejudice, any pending motions were declared moot, and the clerk was directed to close the case.
The detailed version
- Duran v. Amsterdam 1883-1887 LLC · No. 1:22-cv-07425
- Rearden
- Oct. 13, 2023
Background
This was a Fair Labor Standards Act case brought by Biondys Duran against Amsterdam 1883-1887 LLC and Staffpro, Inc. On July 20, 2023, the parties filed a settlement agreement and a joint letter explaining its terms.
Settlement Review
The court evaluated whether the proposed settlement was fair and reasonable. It considered the plaintiff’s possible recovery, the burdens and expenses the settlement would avoid, the litigation risks, whether experienced counsel negotiated the agreement at arm’s length, and the possibility of fraud or collusion.
The court found that the settlement was fair and reasonable and resulted from arm’s-length negotiations, rather than fraud or collusion. The court noted that Duran was represented by counsel, that the parties had participated in the court’s mediation program, that Duran would receive a significant portion of the estimated unpaid wages claimed, and that the agreement included a waiver of rent and other costs valued at approximately $48,000. The agreement did not contain a confidentiality clause.
Attorney’s Fees and Disposition
The court approved attorney’s fees equal to one-third of the recovered amount as fair and reasonable. Judge Jennifer H. Rearden approved the parties’ settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice. The court also ruled that any pending motions were moot and directed the clerk to close the case.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.