Castro v. Feel the World, Inc.
- Valerie Caproni
- 1:23-cv-05084
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Castro v. Feel the World, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice, but the settlement bound only Castro and the defendant.
Felix Castro and Feel the World, Inc. were affected by the dismissal and settlement. Absent putative class members were not bound by the dismissal or any settlement.
What happened
In Castro v. Feel the World, Inc., the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The court canceled the scheduled conferences and deadlines.
The court dismissed the case with prejudice and ordered that neither party would pay costs or attorneys’ fees. It closed the case and removed the language identifying Felix Castro as suing for other similarly situated people.
Judge Caproni stated that the dismissal and any settlement applied only between Castro and Feel the World, Inc. and did not bind absent putative class members because the parties had not told the court they intended to follow the required class-settlement procedures. The parties could ask to reopen the case within 30 days for good cause and could ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement by submitting the agreement and a separate request.
The detailed version
- Castro v. Feel the World, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-05084
- Valerie Caproni
- Oct. 16, 2023
Background
On October 13, 2023, Felix Castro and Feel the World, Inc. notified the court that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues in the case. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or provide the settlement’s terms.
Court’s Orders
The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.
The parties could apply to reopen the case within 30 days. Such an application had to show good cause for keeping the case open despite the settlement. The court also explained that, if the parties wanted the court to retain authority to enforce the settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement and request an order expressly retaining that authority within the same 30-day period.
Class-Related Limitation
The court directed the Clerk to remove the caption language stating that Castro sued individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. Because the parties had not told the court that they intended to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), the dismissal and any settlement applied only between Castro and Feel the World, Inc. They did not bind absent putative class members.
Disposition
Judge Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice, without costs or attorneys’ fees to either party, directed that the case be closed, and limited the effect of the dismissal and settlement to Castro and Feel the World, Inc. The order did not decide the merits of the underlying claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.