Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 20, 2023

Newby v. United States

Judge
Barbara Moses
Docket
1:23-cv-04780
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureTort
In one sentence

In Newby v. United States, Judge Moses consolidated two collision actions into No. 23-CV-4780 and closed No. 23-CV-9067.

Who this affects

Raylando D. Newby, Sideke Fogo, and the United States; the cases were combined under No. 23-CV-4780, and No. 23-CV-9067 was closed.

What happened

Newby v. United States and a related action by Sideke Fogo arose from the same January 13, 2022, collision involving a United States Postal Service vehicle and a private vehicle. Both plaintiffs sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, a law allowing certain claims for harm caused by federal employees.

The parties jointly asked the court to combine the cases because they involved the same collision, defendant, and law. The court ordered the cases consolidated for all purposes into the first-filed case, No. 23-CV-4780. It allowed the plaintiffs to file one combined complaint but did not require them to do so, and it closed No. 23-CV-9067.

Judge Barbara Moses also postponed the initial case-management conference to January 11, 2024, and directed the parties to submit a required pre-conference statement. The order addressed case administration and did not decide whether either plaintiff was entitled to recover damages.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Newby v. United States · No. 1:23-cv-04780
Judge
Barbara Moses
Date
Oct. 20, 2023

Background

The order concerns two related actions:

- Raylando D. Newby sued the United States in the Southern District of New York under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). - Sideke Fogo sued the United States under the FTCA in the Eastern District of New York. That action was later transferred to the Southern District of New York with the parties' consent.

Both actions arose from a motor-vehicle collision on January 13, 2022. The opinion states that a United States Postal Service vehicle driven by Lori M. Mays collided with a private vehicle driven by Raylando D. Newby, with Sideke Fogo as a passenger.

Reasoning

The court applied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), which permits a district court to combine actions involving common issues of law or fact to avoid unnecessary cost and delay. The court noted that both actions involved the same collision, that the plaintiffs had been in the same vehicle, that both sued the same defendant under the same statute, and that the parties jointly requested consolidation.

Ruling and case management

The court ordered that the two actions be consolidated for all purposes into the first-filed case, No. 23-CV-4780. The plaintiffs may, but are not required to, file a consolidated complaint by November 30, 2023. If they continue with separate complaints, future filings must display both captions but use only the consolidated docket number, No. 23-CV-4780. The court directed that No. 23-CV-9067 be marked closed.

The court also adjourned the initial case-management conference in No. 23-CV-4780 from November 7, 2023, to January 11, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. The order directed all three parties to submit a pre-conference statement by the stated deadline. It did not resolve the underlying FTCA claims or determine liability or damages.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.