Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 23, 2023

Vista Food Exchange, Inc. v. Law

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:21-cv-04689
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Vista Food Exchange v. Law, Judge Carter granted Vista’s motion to amend a judgment, adding Simon Law and Fortress Foods and enforcing a contempt award.

Who this affects

Vista Food Exchange, Inc., Lawson Foods LLC, Simon Law, and Fortress Foods. The ruling adds Simon Law and Fortress Foods to the jointly and severally liable parties for the judgment and directs payment of the $392,376 contempt award.

What happened

In Vista Food Exchange, Inc. v. Law, Vista Food Exchange asked the court to amend a judgment that had been entered against Lawson Foods LLC. Vista argued that the judgment should also hold Simon Law and Fortress Foods jointly and severally responsible.

The court found that it had intended to adopt a recommendation holding Lawson Foods LLC, Simon Law, and Fortress Foods jointly and severally liable, but that its amended order accidentally omitted Simon Law and Fortress Foods. Vista also asked the court to enforce a separate contempt award totaling $392,376, consisting of attorneys’ fees and daily contempt fines.

Judge Carter granted Vista’s motion to alter or amend the judgment. He directed that the defendants pay the contempt award in full within 30 days and stated that further civil contempt proceedings could follow. The court dismissed Vista’s motion to expedite as moot.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Vista Food Exchange, Inc. v. Law · No. 1:21-cv-04689
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Oct. 23, 2023

Background

On April 3, 2023, the Clerk entered a $3,133,627.31 judgment in favor of Vista Food Exchange, Inc. against Lawson Foods, LLC in a prior related proceeding. Vista then filed a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), which permits a court to alter or amend a judgment, asking the court to enter an amended judgment against Lawson Foods LLC, Simon Law, and Fortress Foods jointly and severally.

The court explained that Rule 59(e) relief may be granted when there has been a change in controlling law, newly available evidence, or a clear legal error or manifest injustice. The court also noted that such relief is an extraordinary remedy generally used sparingly.

Court’s Analysis

A magistrate judge had recommended that Lawson Foods LLC, Simon Law, and Fortress Foods be held jointly and severally liable for $2,258,537. The court adopted that recommendation and later issued an amended order finding Lawson Foods LLC liable for that amount. The court concluded that it had intended to adopt the recommendation in full but had accidentally omitted Simon Law and Fortress Foods from the judgment. It therefore found that the judgment contained an error.

Vista also asked the court to amend the judgment to enforce a separate contempt award entered in November 2019. That award required Lawson Foods LLC, Simon Law, and Fortress Foods to pay Vista $392,376, consisting of $314,576 in attorneys’ fees and $77,800 in daily contempt fines. The court stated that the defendants had not fully complied and that amending the judgment was appropriate to correct the error and prevent an unfair result.

Disposition

Judge Carter granted Vista’s motion to alter or amend the judgment. The court directed the defendants to pay the contempt award in full within 30 days, warning that they could face further civil contempt proceedings. The court dismissed Vista’s separate motion to expedite as moot and directed the Clerk to terminate both motions.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.