Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 25, 2023

Cruz v. Con Edison of New York

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:23-cv-09139
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Cruz v. Con Edison of New York, Judge Schofield ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

Who this affects

Brian Cruz and the defendants Con Edison of New York, Edward Naylor, Jr., and Peter Correia; the Clerk of Court and U.S. Marshals Service were directed to take steps to complete service.

What happened

Brian Cruz, representing himself, sued Con Edison of New York, Edward Naylor, Jr., and Peter Correia. He alleges race and disability discrimination under federal, state, and city laws. The court had already allowed him to proceed without prepaying court fees.

Because Cruz was allowed to proceed without prepaying court fees, the court directed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses and provide the U.S. Marshals Service with the documents and addresses needed to serve the three defendants. The court also extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses are issued.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield ordered the Clerk to complete the service forms, issue the summonses, send the materials to the Marshals Service, and mail Cruz an information package and a copy of the order. The order did not decide whether the discrimination allegations were legally valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cruz v. Con Edison of New York · No. 1:23-cv-09139
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Oct. 25, 2023

Background

Brian Cruz, proceeding without a lawyer, brought claims against Con Edison of New York, Edward Naylor, Jr., and Peter Correia. The opinion says that Cruz alleges discrimination based on race and disability under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and New York State and City human-rights laws. In an earlier order dated October 19, 2023, the court granted Cruz permission to proceed without prepaying court fees.

Service of Process

Service of process is the formal delivery of the summons and complaint to the defendants. Because Cruz was allowed to proceed without prepaying court fees, the court stated that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to complete service. The court directed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, issue summonses, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service.

The order states that service must be completed within 90 days after the summonses are issued. It explains that this deadline applies because Cruz could not have served the summonses and complaint before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered the summonses issued. If service is not completed within that period, Cruz should request an extension of time. The order also requires Cruz to notify the court in writing if his address changes and states that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.

Ruling

Judge Lorna G. Schofield instructed the Clerk to issue the summonses, complete the service forms using the listed addresses for Con Edison of New York, Edward Naylor, Jr., and Peter Correia, and provide all necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Cruz an information package and a copy of the order. This order concerned service of the lawsuit and did not resolve the merits of Cruz’s discrimination claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.