Williams v. Glengariff Rehabilitation Healthcare Center
- Laura Swain
- 1:23-cv-09143
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 5
In Williams v. Glengariff Rehabilitation Healthcare Center, Judge Swain transferred Williams’s employment case to the Eastern District of New York because the events and defendants were in Nassau County.
Latoya Williams’s case was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. Glengariff Rehabilitation Healthcare Center, Ms. Marlene, and Ms. Agusto are the defendants, and the Eastern District will decide whether Williams may proceed without prepaying fees.
What happened
In Williams v. Glengariff Rehabilitation Healthcare Center, Latoya Williams, representing herself, sued her former employer and two nursing administrators. She alleged employment discrimination and retaliation under federal and New York law, along with other unspecified claims.
The Southern District of New York transferred the case to the Eastern District of New York. The court said the alleged events and the employer were in Nassau County, where relevant witnesses and documents could also be located. It did not decide whether Williams’s claims were valid.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the transfer under the federal convenience statute. The Southern District case was closed, summonses were not issued there, and the Eastern District court was left to decide whether Williams could continue without paying filing fees. The court also denied fee-free status for an appeal.
The detailed version
- Williams v. Glengariff Rehabilitation Healthcare Center · No. 1:23-cv-09143
- Laura Swain
- Oct. 25, 2023
Background
Latoya Williams filed this action without a lawyer. She asserted employment-discrimination and retaliation claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New York State Human Rights Law. The court also understood her complaint to assert claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and additional unspecified state, federal, and municipal laws.
Williams sued Glengariff Rehabilitation Healthcare Center, identified as her former employer, along with Glengariff’s supervisor of nursing, “Ms. Marlene,” and director of nursing, “Ms. Agusto.” The opinion states that Glengariff is in Glen Cove, Nassau County, New York, and that Williams alleged the events supporting her claims, including an alleged assault, occurred in Nassau County.
Venue and Transfer
The court explained that Title VII permits an employment-discrimination action to be filed in several districts connected to the alleged unlawful employment practice, including where the practice occurred or where relevant employment records are maintained. The court concluded that the Southern District of New York, as well as other federal districts in New York, was a proper venue for Williams’s Title VII claims.
For the § 1981 and state-law claims, the court said it was unclear whether venue was proper in the Southern District under the rule concerning where defendants reside because Williams did not identify where all defendants reside. Even assuming venue was proper there, the court concluded that the Eastern District was also a proper venue because the alleged events occurred in Nassau County.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), a federal court may transfer a case to another proper federal district for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. The court determined that transfer appeared appropriate because the alleged events and defendants were in Nassau County, and relevant documents and witnesses could reasonably be expected to be there. It therefore found the Eastern District of New York to be a more convenient forum.
Disposition
The court directed the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. It stated that the transferee court would decide whether Williams could proceed without prepaying fees. Summonses were not to issue from the Southern District, and the order closed the action in that court.
The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), and denied Williams permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order transferred the case and addressed filing-fee and appeal matters; it did not resolve the merits of Williams’s discrimination, retaliation, or other claims.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.