Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund v. USA Roofing Co…
Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund and Training Program Fund v. USA Roofing Co. Corp.
- Subramanian
- 1:22-cv-09953
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Mason Tenders Funds v. USA Roofing, Judge Subramanian confirmed the entire unopposed arbitration award after finding no basis to vacate it.
The petitioners and USA Roofing Co. Corp.; the entire arbitration award was confirmed against USA Roofing.
What happened
In Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund and Training Program Fund v. USA Roofing Co. Corp., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award. USA Roofing did not respond, appear, or seek relief from the award.
The court treated the unopposed petition like a request for summary judgment, meaning it decided whether the petitioners were entitled to judgment based on their submissions. After reviewing the petition and supporting materials, the court found no genuine dispute that prevented confirming the award. The arbitration decision also showed that USA Roofing had consented to the award.
The court granted the petitioners’ unopposed petition to confirm the entire award and found no basis under Section 10(a) of the Federal Arbitration Act to vacate it. Judge Arun Subramanian directed the petitioners to file a proposed judgment.
The detailed version
- Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund v. USA Roofing Co… · No. 1:22-cv-09953
- Subramanian
- Oct. 26, 2023
Background
On November 28, 2022, the petitioners filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The court later set a schedule for additional supporting materials, USA Roofing’s opposition, and the petitioners’ reply. The petitioners served USA Roofing with the petition, supporting materials, and briefing schedule. USA Roofing’s opposition was due October 6, 2023, but it did not respond, appear in the case, or seek relief from the arbitration award.
Court’s analysis
The court explained that an unopposed petition to confirm an arbitration award must still be evaluated on the petitioners’ submissions. It treated the petition as similar to a motion for summary judgment, which asks whether the evidence shows that the moving party is entitled to judgment without a trial. After reviewing the petition and supporting materials, the court found no genuine issue of material fact preventing summary judgment as to any part of the award. The court stated that the arbitrator’s decision provided more than a barely colorable justification for its result and reflected that USA Roofing had consented to the award.
The court also found no basis under Section 10(a) of the Federal Arbitration Act to vacate the award. The opinion does not describe the award’s underlying terms.
Ruling
Judge Arun Subramanian granted the petitioners’ unopposed petition to confirm the entire arbitration award. The petitioners were directed to file their proposed judgment electronically by November 9, 2023.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.
Related cases
- District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of…Aug 2024
- VC Healthyv. ILKB
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…Aug 2024
- Trustees of the District Council No.9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund and…Aug 2024
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…Jul 2024
- Bartonv. Zhang