Urangesellschaft MBH v. Nynco Trading LTD
- Ho
- 1:23-cv-07713
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Urangesellschaft MBH v. Nynco Trading LTD, Judge Ho set deadlines for briefing and service on a petition to confirm an arbitration award.
Urangesellschaft MBH must meet the filing and service deadlines; Nynco Trading LTD may oppose the petition by the stated deadline.
What happened
Urangesellschaft MBH asked the Southern District of New York to confirm an arbitration award against Nynco Trading LTD. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute or award.
The court ordered Urangesellschaft MBH to file and serve any additional supporting materials by November 13, 2023. Nynco Trading LTD’s opposition, if any, was due December 4, and Urangesellschaft MBH’s reply, if any, was due December 11.
Judge Dale E. Ho also required service of the petition, supporting papers, and the order under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by November 13, with proof of service due November 14. The court did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.
The detailed version
- Urangesellschaft MBH v. Nynco Trading LTD · No. 1:23-cv-07713
- Ho
- Oct. 27, 2023
Background
Urangesellschaft MBH filed a petition on August 30, 2023, asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion does not provide details about the arbitration, the award, or the parties’ underlying dispute.
Court’s Order
The court explained that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment. It ordered Urangesellschaft MBH to file and serve any additional materials supporting its petition by November 13, 2023. Nynco Trading LTD’s opposition, if any, was due December 4, 2023, and Urangesellschaft MBH’s reply, if any, was due December 11, 2023.
Urangesellschaft MBH also had to serve the petition, all supporting papers, and the order on Nynco Trading LTD under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by November 13, 2023. It had to file proof of that service by November 14, 2023.
Disposition and Effect
Judge Dale E. Ho entered a scheduling and service order. The opinion did not grant or deny the petition to confirm the arbitration award and did not reach the merits of that petition.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.